Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-17 Thread Scott Schaffer
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can any one explain what happens in the debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x2982e68) implements 'check_post_dnsbl' section bel

Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-17 Thread Scott Schaffer
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can any one explain what happens in the debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x2982e68) implements 'check_post_dnsbl' section bel

Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-17 Thread Scott Schaffer
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can any one explain what happens in the debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x2982e68) implements 'check_post_dnsbl' section bel

Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-13 Thread Scott Schaffer
So why do they work on one machine and not the other? Both machines are SA 3.0.0. and are virtually identical in setup. >>> Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/13/05 09:34AM >>> On Friday, May 13, 2005, 8:19:57 AM, Scott Schaffer wrote: > SA 3.0.0 on both machines One thing to note is that the URID

Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-13 Thread Jeff Chan
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 8:19:57 AM, Scott Schaffer wrote: > SA 3.0.0 on both machines One thing to note is that the URIDNSBL rules in 3.0.0 are type "header" while they're type "body" in later versions. If you're using rules quoted for URIDNSBL for example on the SURBL site, they usually mention

Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-13 Thread Scott Schaffer
SA 3.0.0 on both machines >>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/13/05 08:06am >>> At 06:14 PM 5/12/2005, Scott Schaffer wrote: >I am migrating spamassassin from my perimeter firewall to another server >to lighten the load on the firewall. I have installed SA3.0 on the new >machine and have don

Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-13 Thread Matt Kettler
At 06:14 PM 5/12/2005, Scott Schaffer wrote: I am migrating spamassassin from my perimeter firewall to another server to lighten the load on the firewall. I have installed SA3.0 on the new machine and have done some testing. I am getting different results on each SA install. Which EXACT version

Re: URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-13 Thread Jeff Chan
On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 3:14:13 PM, Scott Schaffer wrote: > Machine behind the firewall results > - > debug: bayes: score = 0.505530427067805 > debug: bayes: 276 untie-ing > debug: bayes: 276

URIDNSBL Scores

2005-05-12 Thread Scott Schaffer
Hi. I am migrating spamassassin from my perimeter firewall to another server to lighten the load on the firewall. I have installed SA3.0 on the new machine and have done some testing. I am getting different results on each SA install. Configuration for both machines: Windows 2000 all hotfixes a