On Thursday, December 1, 2011, 10:11:35 AM, Darxus Darxus wrote:
> On 12/01, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Also keep in mind that PH has a generally low score even for net
>> + bayes since it doesn't hit a large portion of spam in the SA
>> corpus.
> No. Scores are not determined by how many spams a rule
On 01/12/2011 20:11, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
So it's entirely possible to have a rule that hits a very small percentage
of spam with a very large score.
Thank you to all who replied.
It is much clearer now.
regards
Tom
On 12/01, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Also keep in mind that PH has a generally low score even for net
> + bayes since it doesn't hit a large portion of spam in the SA
> corpus.
No. Scores are not determined by how many spams a rule hits. Scores are
automatically generated to correctly flag as many spa
Also keep in mind that PH has a generally low score even for net
+ bayes since it doesn't hit a large portion of spam in the SA
corpus. (In other words phishing and malware unsolicited
messages are a relatively small subset of unsolicited messages in
general.) However the unsolicited messages it
On 01/12/11 08:29, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good morning list.
could someone possibly explain how the scoring for ph.surbl.org works?
I see the following in my spam logs
spam-1DSMgl4+-YFV.gz: TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY=1.258, URIBL_PH_SURBL=0.001]
spam-1DSMgl4+-YFV.gz: * 0.0 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an
Good morning list.
could someone possibly explain how the scoring for ph.surbl.org
works?
I see the following in my spam logs
spam-1DSMgl4+-YFV.gz: TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY=1.258,
URIBL_PH_SURBL=0.001]
spam-1DSMgl4+-YFV.gz: * 0.0 URIBL_PH_SURBL
thanks Jeff! here's the new FAQ entry:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OpenDnsAndUribls
feel free to modify, guys.
--j.
Jeff Chan writes:
> If it helps, here's what I wrote for the SURBL FAQ:
>
> http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#opendns
>
>
> I'm using OpenDNS and getting wrong answers to
If it helps, here's what I wrote for the SURBL FAQ:
http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#opendns
I'm using OpenDNS and getting wrong answers to SURBL DNS queries
OpenDNS is a service that changes the responses to some DNS
queries in order to prevent users from visiting spam, phishing,
etc., sites. I
David Ulevitch writes:
>On Sep 30, 2006, at 3:30 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>> David Ulevitch writes:
>>>
>>> Donald,
>>>
>>> We handle DNSBLs but not URIBLs, at the moment. Passing along to
>>> Noah to see what he can do. Sorry you had this happen to your
>>> SpamAssassin scoring. (Time to check
On Sep 30, 2006, at 3:30 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
David Ulevitch writes:
Donald,
We handle DNSBLs but not URIBLs, at the moment. Passing along to
Noah to see what he can do. Sorry you had this happen to your
SpamAssassin scoring. (Time to check mine... :-) )
You can resolve this behavior by
David Ulevitch writes:
>> From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Date: Friday, September 29, 2006, 3:59:03 PM
>> Subject: Non-blocklisted embedded URLs are getting hits on
>> URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SU
From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Friday, September 29, 2006, 3:59:03 PM
Subject: Non-blocklisted embedded URLs are getting hits on
URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL in SpamAssassin 3.1.5
===8<==Original message text===
On
whence I came. Thank you,
> Don Craig
>
> I'm getting matches whenever I have an embedded URL
> on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL -
> unless the URL is actually in URIBL_SBL, in which case the
> logic for a
Of course. I'm an idiot. I switched to OpenDNS a couple of weeks back.
Time to return from whence I came. Thank you,
Don Craig
I'm getting matches whenever I have an embedded URL
on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL
whence I came. Thank you,
> Don Craig
>
> I'm getting matches whenever I have an embedded URL
> on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL -
> unless the URL is actually in URIBL_SBL, in which case the
> logic for
Don Craig
I'm getting matches whenever I have an embedded URL
on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL -
unless the URL is actually in URIBL_SBL, in which case the
logic for all the flavors of URIBL_XX_SURBL seems
to work correctly. I have verified the
absence of the incorrectly matching
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:26:41PM -0700, Donald Craig wrote:
> I'm getting matches whenever I have an embedded URL
> on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL -
You're not by chance using the opendns.{com,org} folks for DNS, are you?
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"You can tel
I'm getting matches whenever I have an embedded URL
on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL -
unless the URL is actually in URIBL_SBL, in which case the
logic for all the flavors of URIBL_XX_SURBL seems
to work correctly. I have verified the
absence of the incorrectly matching URLs from SURBL
18 matches
Mail list logo
