On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:28:27PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Both of these assume I know every person who needs to e-mail me, and
> everything they will send me. Theo, you're active in enough open
> source projects to know better.
Well, you just said you were receiving a large amount of "syste
On Jul 2, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
If these are from known good sources, just whitelist them (or skip SA
altogether). Otherwise, if the names are specific, you could always
use uridnsbl_skip_domain to bypass URIDNSBL checks on the parsed
domains.
Both of these assume I know e
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:05:17PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I need to completely disable this over-opportunistic behavior. 90%
> of my e-mails have either system output, or are concerning code
> segments or router interfaces, etc, etc. I need these mails to get
> through.
>
> At the very le
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need to completely disable this over-opportunistic behavior. 90%
of my e-mails have either system output, or are concerning code
segments or router interfaces, etc, etc. I need these mails to get
through.
At the very least, common collisions like scri
> From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > SA doesn't just look for full URLs, it looks for things that could
be
> > hostnames ala "copy www.example.com into your browser".
>
> This is fairly nonfunctional. I've been chasing around all sorts of
> FPs that seem to hit pretty much every mess
On Jun 30, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:07:04PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
When in doubt, run through "spamassassin -D":
[9710] dbg: uridnsbl: domains to query: sync.pl svcolo.com
Thanks for
Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been down
for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case someone is
dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
This has been answered, but, if you're
Quoting SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Jeff,
> At 03:58 01-07-2007, Jeff Chan wrote:
> >http://lookup.uribl.com/?domain=sync.pl
>
> I missed that one. :-) It's not listed though.
It was listed when I wrote.
Jeff C.
Hi Jeff,
At 03:58 01-07-2007, Jeff Chan wrote:
http://lookup.uribl.com/?domain=sync.pl
I missed that one. :-) It's not listed though.
Regards,
-sm
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 at 05:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Quoting SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed a
Quoting SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
> >Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
> >down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
> >someone is dual listed and can fix it.
> >
> >There's no URL in this message. What i
At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
There was a URL in
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:07:04PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
When in doubt, run through "spamassassin -D":
[9710] dbg: uridnsbl: domains to query: sync.pl svcolo.com
SA doesn't just look for full URLs, it looks for things that coul
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
Begin forwarded message:
From: *snip*
Date: June 29,
14 matches
Mail list logo
