On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Jeff Chan wrote:
> It seems that the particular URI obfuscation in:
>
> http://www.surbl.org/evidence/seruikiontunhfasnde.com.txt
>
> successfully confuses SpamAssassin 3.1.6 into not detecting the
> SURBL blacklisted URI.
How about a rule that adds points for a link with
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 10:29 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: URI obfuscation that confuses SA
>
>However, it's just doing a se
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> When I past that (with the munged) in it I get a nasa web site.
> (maybe google built into firefox finds the nasa site)
>
>
> http://8ZC*2/F3B.seruikiontuMUNGED.com/?LHN-+IA-
>
>
> Scarry crap.
>
> Hey nasa: is this even something you want public?
> I will send you link i
On Sat, November 18, 2006 14:45, Justin Mason wrote:
> http://8ZC*2/F3B.seruikiontuMUNGED.com/?LHN-+IA- >
> link
> Surely that doesn't work. certainly doesn't with any of my MUAs! anyone
> got a copy of Lookout or Outlook Express they can test with?
fedora core 6 x86_64 firefox 1.5.0.8 display
.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:46 AM
> To: Matt Kettler
> Cc: Jeff Chan; SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: Re: URI obfuscation that confuses SA
>
>
>
> Matt Kettler writes:
> > Jeff
Matt Kettler writes:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
> > It seems that the particular URI obfuscation in:
> >
> > http://www.surbl.org/evidence/seruikiontunhfasnde.com.txt
> >
> > successfully confuses SpamAssassin 3.1.6 into not detecting the
> > SURBL blacklisted URI.
> >
>
> Does that even work as a l
Jeff Chan wrote:
> It seems that the particular URI obfuscation in:
>
> http://www.surbl.org/evidence/seruikiontunhfasnde.com.txt
>
> successfully confuses SpamAssassin 3.1.6 into not detecting the
> SURBL blacklisted URI.
>
Does that even work as a link? Doesn't seem to work in firefox or IE
