On 28 Mar 2020, at 3:09, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When looking at email that was marked as spam, I saw the following:
1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
blocklist
[URIs: techwrestle.com]
2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM
On 28 Mar 2020, at 01:09, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Should not one of those two be removed, because it is now penalised
> two times.
It is penalized for being in SURBL and then penalized for being in the DBL;
seems perfectly reasonable to me.
--
"You're just impressed by any pretty girl who c
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 28.03.20 um 08:09 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:
When looking at email that was marked as spam, I saw the following:
1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
blocklist
Hai!
1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
blocklist
[URIs: techwrestle.com]
2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL
blocklist
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 28.03.20 um 08:09 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:
>> When looking at email that was marked as spam, I saw the following:
>> 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
>> blocklist
>> [URIs: tech
When looking at email that was marked as spam, I saw the following:
1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
blocklist
[URIs: techwrestle.com]
2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus
