Message original
Sujet : Re: URI-DNSBL problem with spamassassin 3.2.5
De : Dan Schaefer
Dan Schaefer wrote:
Please, can someone feed http://pastebin.ca/1495707 into
spamassassin 3.3.0 and see how it works ?
Hi!
pts rule name description
Dan Schaefer wrote:
Hi!
Please, can someone feed http://pastebin.ca/1495707 into spamassassin
3.3.0 and see how it works ?
Many thanks for your help
Eddy
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 HTML_MESSAG
Hi!
Please, can someone feed http://pastebin.ca/1495707 into spamassassin
3.3.0 and see how it works ?
Many thanks for your help
Eddy
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTM
Message original
Sujet : Re: URI-DNSBL problem with spamassassin 3.2.5
Date : 2009-07-14 11:07
but Ido not find any timing.log file on my current directory or
anywhere on my system!!
Did I missed something ?
I doubt all the necessary hooks are in place for that plugin to work
Message original
Sujet : Re: URI-DNSBL problem with spamassassin 3.2.5
De : Michael Parker
Pour : Eddy Beliveau
Copie à : users@spamassassin.apache.org, Mark Martinec
Date : 2009-07-09 19:37
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Eddy Beliveau wrote:
but Ido not find any
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Eddy Beliveau wrote:
but Ido not find any timing.log file on my current directory or
anywhere on my system!!
Did I missed something ?
I doubt all the necessary hooks are in place for that plugin to work
in 3.2.5, you'd need to run 3.3 to make use of that plu
Is there some way to find the culprit rule ?
other that removing all rules and adding them one at the time.
Perhaps the best timing tool for rules is the HitFreqsRuleTiming
plugin, which can be found in masses/plugins/HitFreqsRuleTiming.pm
in the distribution. Should work with 3.2.5 and w
Eddy,
> So I spin it again with "-L -D"
> 09:24:10.109 16.022 0.036 [20476] dbg: rules: ran rawbody rule
> __SARE_HAS_FG_COLOR ==> got hit: ""color:"
> 09:45:09.826 1275.740 1259.717 [20476] dbg: rules: ran eval rule
> __SARE_HTML_HAS_BR ==> got hit (1)
> So, after the 20 minutes delay
Message original
Sujet : Re: URI-DNSBL problem with spamassassin 3.2.5
De : John Hardin
Pour : Eddy Beliveau
Copie à : SpamAssassin Users List
Date : 2009-07-07 16:49
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Mark Martinec wrote:
It is not the DNS query that is a problem here.
Eddy:
What
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Mark Martinec wrote:
It is not the DNS query that is a problem here.
Eddy:
What happens when you run the test using -L (no network tests)? Does it
still take as long?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaho
Eddy,
> I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5 on my academic RHEL server and it works
> well :-)
> I'm also using Net::DNS version: 0.65, amavisd-new 2.6.4, postfix 2.5.6
>
> I'm receiving an email which take too much time to process.
> I have to remove it from my postfix's mail queue
>
> here is part of
Hi! Netfriends,
I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5 on my academic RHEL server and it works
well :-)
I'm also using Net::DNS version: 0.65, amavisd-new 2.6.4, postfix 2.5.6
I'm receiving an email which take too much time to process.
I have to remove it from my postfix's mail queue
here is part of
12 matches
Mail list logo
