On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Henry F. Camacho, Jr. wrote:
> You are seeing the child of spamd. Both are not taking 20 megs of
> memory, that is the shared memory allocation. I think what you are
> seeing is the shared memory being applied to each of the other
> processes because spamd uses linux threads.
On Sonntag, 12. Februar 2006 20:59 Jan Krumsiek wrote:
> Is this really the same process with two threads?
Run "pstree -p"
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Michael Monnerie
// http://zmi.at Tel: 0660/4156531 Linux 2.6.11
// PGP Key: "lynx -source
Henry F. Camacho Jr schrieb:
>> You are seeing the child of spamd. Both are not taking 20 megs of
>> memory, that is the shared memory allocation. I think what you are
>> seeing is the shared memory being applied to each of the other processes
>> because spamd uses linux threads.
Are you sure?
You are seeing the child of spamd. Both are not taking 20 megs of
memory, that is the shared memory allocation. I think what you are
seeing is the shared memory being applied to each of the other processes
because spamd uses linux threads.
HFC
Jan Krumsiek wrote:
Hi.
We need to run spamd
fork: child states: I
-Original Message-
From: Jan Krumsiek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:16 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Two instances of spamd
Hi.
We need to run spamd on a linux system with minimal memory resources. I
noticed that spamd s
Hi.
We need to run spamd on a linux system with minimal memory resources. I
noticed that spamd seems to be running twice, each of the instances
taking up over 20mb of memory. I already tried setting
"--max-children=0" in the OPTIONS parameter in
/etc/default/spamassassin. Unfortunately this did no
