> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:10:39PM -0600, Matt wrote:
> > score SPF_FAIL 10
> > score SPF_SOFTFAIL 5
> > score SPF_NEUTRAL 2
On 28.01.08 17:28, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> If you wanted to give a small positive score for these, that might not be
> terrible. Anything over 1 is asking for trouble IM
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:10:39PM -0600, Matt wrote:
> Does anyone see anything wrong with these scores? The RDNS_DYNAMIC
> worries me a bit since I know a few email servers hosted on dynamic
> looking reverse DNS's.
Well, first, the scores are really aggressive. Generally speaking, you don't
w
I have added the following to the local.cf to decrease the spam that
gets through.
score RCVD_IN_PBL 3
score RCVD_IN_XBL 5
score RDNS_NONE 5
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 3
score SPF_FAIL 10
score SPF_SOFTFAIL 5
score SPF_NEUTRAL 2
score RDNS_DYNAMIC 3
Does anyone see anything wrong with these scores?
