Andy Jezierski wrote:
Dr Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/28/2005
07:06:35 PM:
> Have a virus scanner that correctly identified the email as having a
> virus attachment, but it still passed along the "cleaned" (ie the
> attachment was removed) email. I was asked if there
Dr Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 07/28/2005 07:06:35 PM:
> Have a virus scanner that correctly identified the email as having
a
> virus attachment, but it still passed along the "cleaned"
(ie the
> attachment was removed) email. I was asked if there was a way
to
> "trash" the
Dr Robert Young wrote:
But you can use milter-spamc to direct all identified "spam" to an acct
such as [EMAIL PROTECTED], and then simply 'dump' the acct's email
periodically. Hence the inquiry
On Jul 28, 2005, at 8:14 PM, jdow wrote:
Please check with the ClamAV people. There is abs
?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Dr Robert Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2005 July, 29, Friday 04:19
Subject: Re: Trying to id spam
> But you can use milter-spamc to direct all identified "spam" to an
> acct such as [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the
But you can use milter-spamc to direct all identified "spam" to an
acct such as [EMAIL PROTECTED], and then simply 'dump' the acct's email
periodically. Hence the inquiry
On Jul 28, 2005, at 8:14 PM, jdow wrote:
Please check with the ClamAV people. There is absolutely no way to get
Sp
> Have a virus scanner that correctly identified the email as having a
> virus attachment, but it still passed along the "cleaned" (ie the
> attachment was removed) email. I was asked if there was a way to
> "trash" the resulting "cleaned" email...
Ah! Different question! Yes, that should be p
Please check with the ClamAV people. There is absolutely no way to get
SpamAssassin to delete emails or even drop them.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Dr Robert Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Have a virus scanner that correctly identified the email as having a
> virus attachment, but
Have a virus scanner that correctly identified the email as having a
virus attachment, but it still passed along the "cleaned" (ie the
attachment was removed) email. I was asked if there was a way to
"trash" the resulting "cleaned" email...
On Jul 28, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Rick Macdougall wr
> -Original Message-
> From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 6:15 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Trying to id spam
>
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
> > Dr Robert Young wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Dr Robert Young wrote:
>
> > We had a very short spam come in (actually it had a virus attachment
> > named "updated-password.zip"). There is not much to grab onto
[snip..]
> > attachment in the header/body of the email to ID this (see below).
> > Any
ess to
our users -- better to just force everyone to
compress or zip if they
have a legitimate reason to send
executables.
Herb Martin[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://LearnQuick.ComAccelerated MCSE in a
Week Seminars
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 3:13
PMTo: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Re: Trying
to id spam
Andy
Dr Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 07/28/2005 03:09:48 PM:
> We had a very short spam come in (actually it had a virus attachment
> named "updated-password.zip"). There is not much to grab
onto
>
[snip]
Don't use SA for trapping viruses, get a virus scanner.
ClamAV comes to mind.
An
Dr Robert Young wrote:
We had a very short spam come in (actually it had a virus attachment
named "updated-password.zip"). There is not much to grab onto
Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
---
We had a very short spam come in (actually it had a virus attachment named "updated-password.zip"). There is not much to grab ontoContent analysis details: (1.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- --
14 matches
Mail list logo
