Re: True spam getting really low Bayesian points

2007-01-26 Thread Kim Christensen
* maillist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-25 10:21:47 -0600]: > Kim Christensen wrote: > >Hey list, > > > >I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my > >personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts. > > > >% sa-learn --dump magic > >... > >0.000

Re: True spam getting really low Bayesian points

2007-01-25 Thread Matt Kettler
Kim Christensen wrote: > Hey list, > > I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my > personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts. > > % sa-learn --dump magic > ... > 0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000

Re: True spam getting really low Bayesian points

2007-01-25 Thread maillist
maillist wrote: Kim Christensen wrote: Hey list, I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts. % sa-learn --dump magic ... 0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000

Re: True spam getting really low Bayesian points

2007-01-25 Thread maillist
Kim Christensen wrote: Hey list, I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts. % sa-learn --dump magic ... 0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0475

True spam getting really low Bayesian points

2007-01-25 Thread Kim Christensen
Hey list, I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts. % sa-learn --dump magic ... 0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0475 0 non-token data