Re: Training Q

2008-01-17 Thread Loren Wilton
Some people advise not to relearn "old spam" what would you suggest, learn only last 6 month e.g.? I'd suggest only the last 3 months or less of spam if you have enough. Old ham should be fine though. Loren

Re: Training Q

2008-01-17 Thread Matthias Haegele
Matthias Haegele schrieb: Some people advise not to relearn "old spam" what would you suggest, learn only last 6 month e.g.? I meant if you must relearn "from scratch" how far you would go back? -- Gruesse/Greetings MH Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Training Q

2008-01-17 Thread Matthias Haegele
John D. Hardin schrieb: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, all 3 categories include emails that SA has already seen and presumably included in its Bayesian filters, Only if you have autolearn enabled. Can we assume that you do from this question? You didn't explicitly say. a

Re: Training Q

2008-01-16 Thread John D. Hardin
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So, all 3 categories include emails that SA has already seen and > presumably included in its Bayesian filters, Only if you have autolearn enabled. Can we assume that you do from this question? You didn't explicitly say. > and emails that it has ne

Training Q

2008-01-16 Thread mackenna
Hi SA experts, We have procmail filters that see emails before SA. They can: 1. whitelist emails direct to our Inbox, 2. send emails to direct to the bit bucket (/dev/null) 3. send emails to the Junk folder for review, or 4. leave them for processing by SA. So SA never sees the emails in categ