t what are people's thoughts on using DCC in SA?
DCC gives a high hit rate on SPAM here, but also contributes highly to
false positives. Since setting up DCC I seem to have lots of list
emails reported as false positives, and spend a fair amount of time
checking and tweaking whitelisting set
On Friday 17 November 2006 02:44, Chris wrote:
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 9:21 am, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > So basically you're right and I haven't added anything. What I can add is
> > that I don't use DCC myself, for precisely the aforementioned reason,
> > i.e. that it requires to much fid
On Thursday 16 November 2006 9:21 am, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Given that what are people's thoughts on using DCC in SA?
> >
> > DCC gives a high hit rate on SPAM here, but also contributes highly to
> > false positives. Since setting up DCC I seem to have lots o
On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:59, Anthony Peacock wrote:
> I realise that DCC is not a direct indicator of spamminess but an
> indicator of bulkiness. And I also realise that the correct answer to
> my question is 'it depends on your local needs'...
>
> Given that what
Hi,
I realise that DCC is not a direct indicator of spamminess but an
indicator of bulkiness. And I also realise that the correct answer to
my question is 'it depends on your local needs'...
Given that what are people's thoughts on using DCC in SA?
DCC gives a high hit ra
