On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:48:15 -0500, Payal Rathod wrote
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:21:56PM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm happy to say that with your help, and some very minor tweaking, the
> > "Pharama" mail is now tagged in my system as high scoring spam, and
> > dealt
Payal Rathod wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:21:56PM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
All,
I'm happy to say that with your help, and some very minor tweaking, the
"Pharama" mail is now tagged in my system as high scoring spam, and dealt
with accordingly ("bad pharma spam, bad!"). Still lo
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:21:56PM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm happy to say that with your help, and some very minor tweaking, the
> "Pharama" mail is now tagged in my system as high scoring spam, and dealt
> with accordingly ("bad pharma spam, bad!"). Still looking forward
All,
I'm happy to say that with your help, and some very minor tweaking, the
"Pharama" mail is now tagged in my system as high scoring spam, and dealt
with accordingly ("bad pharma spam, bad!"). Still looking forward to new
rules that Loren spoke earlier, though.
Thanks so much.
Dimitri
On 03/17/2006 08:57 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Warren Howard wrote:
>> Same problem for me (using Spamassassin 3.1.0). I keep feeding
>> sa-learn the "Re: PharamaCFcy news", always the same style of message
>> but each time slightly different, the drugs and prices are on the
>> left and rubbish like
These things are being properly detected for me. Here's the headers from
one I received this morning:
--
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on titan.sthomas.net
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Statu
ECTED]
> > Sent: 17 March 2006 15:38
> > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: This isn't being tagged
> >
> > I want to bottom-post, but ...
> >
> > Martin,
> >
> > Forgive my ignorance, but what is URI_BLACK? Where can I ge
http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 March 2006 15:38
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: This isn't
Randal
> > Network Engineer
> > Herefordshire Council
> > Hereford, UK
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Warren Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 17 March 2006 14:40
> > > To: Dimitri Yioulos; use
I've just checked and whilst that score might seem high, it's causing no
false positives here.
Of the last 98,932 emails to flow through our gateway, 5,265 hit
HC_NEWS, of which 1,328 were ham (25.2%) and 3,937 (74.8%) spam.
header HC_NEWS Subject =~ /\bnews/i
describe HC_NEWSNew
Warren Howard wrote:
>
> Same problem for me (using Spamassassin 3.1.0). I keep feeding
> sa-learn the "Re: PharamaCFcy news", always the same style of message
> but each time slightly different, the drugs and prices are on the
> left and rubbish like this dacgvishJybzjjt is on the right. The spa
5:04
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: This isn't being tagged
>
> Hmm,
>
> We're blocking loads of these:
>
> 2.91 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC
> (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
> 2.00 HC_NEWS News of new spam
> 0.1
quot; in the Subject line.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Warren Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 17 March 2006 14:40
> > To:
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 March 2006 14:40
> To: Dimitri Yioulos; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: This isn't being tagged
>
> On 03/17/2006 06:59 PM, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > Hello to all.
> >
> > I apologize for earlier posts on this subject;
On Friday March 17 2006 9:49 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Don't know why you are getting bayes_00, but we are working on some rules
> for these things that are looking pretty good. Should be available fairly
> soon.
>
> Loren
Thanks, Lauren.
Dimitri
--
This message has been scanned for vi
Don't know why you are getting bayes_00, but we are working on some rules
for these things that are looking pretty good. Should be available fairly
soon.
Loren
On 03/17/2006 06:59 PM, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Hello to all.
>
> I apologize for earlier posts on this subject; they were tagged by the list
> because I included the body of the spam which is being delivered to my users!
>
> So, there's hope that I can quash this. I searched the archive, bu
Hello to all.
I apologize for earlier posts on this subject; they were tagged by the list
because I included the body of the spam which is being delivered to my users!
So, there's hope that I can quash this. I searched the archive, but didn't
find anything (my search criteria may have been wr
18 matches
Mail list logo
