Re: These should be tagged...

2005-08-30 Thread jdow
As mentioned AmaVis is in there puddle you are working with. But just for grins and giggles grep your mail logs for a "PerMsgStatus" note from SpamAssassin. That would prevent any markup at all from happening. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Anders Norrbring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tak

Re: These should be tagged...

2005-08-30 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:35 AM 8/30/2005, Anders Norrbring wrote: Take a look at this message source, it doesn't get tagged at all! That's because you use amavis and your tag_level is set to something above -9. SA always at least inserts a header telling you what rules matched and what score it totaled.

RE: These should be tagged...

2005-08-30 Thread Pierre Thomson
Anders Norrbring wrote: > Take a look at this message source, it doesn't get tagged at all! Well, on my SA 2.64 install it sure gets hammered, but not by stock rules: Content analysis details: (18.7 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description -- -

These should be tagged...

2005-08-30 Thread Anders Norrbring
Take a look at this message source, it doesn't get tagged at all! Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.the-server.net ([unix socket]) by iris (Cyrus v2.1.15) with LMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:06:37 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.