Hi Kevin, everyone,
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Paul Boven wrote:
but my goal is to find a way of doing this that is
independent of the rest of the mail-system, and can then become an
integral part of SA.
Any suggestions on how to do this? One of SA's strengths is that it is
designed to be a modu
Paul Boven wrote:
Hi Jim,
Jim Maul wrote:
Paul Boven wrote:
Bayes is a very powerfull system, especially for recognising
site-specific ham. But at this moment, apx. 30% of the spam that
slips trough my filter has 'autolearn=ham' set. And another 60% of
the spam slipping trough has a negative Ba
Paul Boven wrote:
Hi Kevin, everyone,
I agree that this would be difficult, but right now we're all facing
that difficulty on our own, so to speak. A more comprehensive Wiki would
help, but my goal is to find a way of doing this that is independent of
the rest of the mail-system, and can then be
Hi Kevin, everyone,
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
2.) There should be a framework within SpamAssassin that makes it easy
for end-users to submit their spam for training. Currently, there are
all kinds of scripts available outside the main SpamAssassin
distribution (I've written my own, too) that atte
Hi Jim,
Jim Maul wrote:
Paul Boven wrote:
Bayes is a very powerfull system, especially for recognising
site-specific ham. But at this moment, apx. 30% of the spam that slips
trough my filter has 'autolearn=ham' set. And another 60% of the spam
slipping trough has a negative Bayes score to help
Paul Boven wrote:
Hi everyone,
Here are some observations on using Bayes and autolearning I would like
to share, and have your input on.
Autolearning is turining out to be more trouble than it's worth.
Although it helps the system to get to know the ham we send and get, and
learn some of the sp
Paul Boven wrote:
Hi everyone,
Here are some observations on using Bayes and autolearning I would like
to share, and have your input on.
Okay!
Some suggestions on improving the performance of the Bayes system:
1.) Messages that have been manually submitted should have a higher
'weight' in the Bay
Paul Boven wrote:
Hi everyone,
Here are some observations on using Bayes and autolearning I would like
to share, and have your input on.
Autolearning is turining out to be more trouble than it's worth.
Although it helps the system to get to know the ham we send and get, and
learn some of the sp
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:28 +0200, Paul Boven wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here are some observations on using Bayes and autolearning I would like
> to share, and have your input on.
>
> Autolearning is turining out to be more trouble than it's worth.
> Although it helps the system to get to know
Hi everyone,
Here are some observations on using Bayes and autolearning I would like
to share, and have your input on.
Autolearning is turining out to be more trouble than it's worth.
Although it helps the system to get to know the ham we send and get, and
learn some of the spams on its own, it
10 matches
Mail list logo
