On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:46 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:43 PM -0700 Loren Wilton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in
> > any corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that thi
--On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:43 PM -0700 Loren Wilton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in
any corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that this is
either a very recent thing or isn't all that universal.
Did yo
FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in any
corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that this is either
a very recent thing or isn't all that universal.
Loren
On Friday, October 26, 2007 11:55 PM +0200 KarstenBräckelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Friday, October 26, 2007 11:55 PM +0200 KarstenBräckelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NOTE: I only did a very brief investigation of Date: headers sent by
The Bat! users on this list. If anyone can assure this, or got any
inside knowledge whether The Bat! can or can not generate such header
A recent discussion about The Bat! [1] the other day reminded me of some
sneaky spam, that frequently managed to score below 15. They caught my
eye for another fact in the first place, though. They all got a specific
Date: header strangeness in common: a Tab char. It was after that, that
I realized
