Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:37:44AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 07:37:28PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Marc Selig
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Are t
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:37:44AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 07:37:28PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Marc Selig
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > >
> > >> Are there any other opt
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 07:37:28PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Marc Selig
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> >
> >> Are there any other options for filtering based on language, or any known
> >> patches/fixes fo
On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Marc Selig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
>> Are there any other options for filtering based on language, or any known
>> patches/fixes for TextCat to make it a bit less aggressive when it runs
>> across gibberish that i
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Are there any other options for filtering based on language, or any known
> patches/fixes for TextCat to make it a bit less aggressive when it runs
> across gibberish that is probably not any particular language?
You could tinke
I’m looking to get some more information on how reliable TextCat can be
considered at this point.
We are running 3.4.0, and have enabled TextCat with some more aggressive
scoring a few month ago based on user requests. For the most part, people
are very happy with this, we had some very bizarre sp
