On 26.09.16 10:21, Maik Linnemann wrote:
Additional: i have a limited number of Mails that are still not tagged.
those mails doesnt regard to the mail size limit scenario as they are for
example between 35kb ans 100kb or so and i have a limit of 2MB. anyone
have a clue how to figure out whats ha
mails have X_ on their external routing way.
With kind of regards,
Maik Linnemann
Von: Maik Linnemann
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2016 13:49
An: Matus UHLAR - fantomas; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO
Thank you very much. That works.
Von: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [uh...@fantomas.sk]
Gesendet: Montag, 19. September 2016 12:26
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
>On
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Maik Linnemann wrote:
SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like:
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
${sender} ${recipient}
Please note the 'max-size' parameter f
o:dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu]
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 18:18
An: Maik Linnemann
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
What do you see in your syslog reports from spamc?
Is it reporting any errors?
Please not
Am 16.09.2016 um 19:27 schrieb Joe Quinn:
On 9/16/2016 12:59 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
...
in case you have postscreen or something else which does proper
rbl-scoring in front of the content-scanners it's no problem because
only a small part of spam attempts are mahing it to SA
may depend
On 9/16/2016 12:59 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
...
in case you have postscreen or something else which does proper
rbl-scoring in front of the content-scanners it's no problem because
only a small part of spam attempts are mahing it to SA
may depend on the amount of ham which can be also mit
Am 16.09.2016 um 18:17 schrieb David B Funk:
What do you see in your syslog reports from spamc?
Is it reporting any errors?
Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc:
-s max_size, --max-size=max_size
Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any
bigger than
ging should already be done (and mostly its the
case!)
Von: li...@rhsoft.net [li...@rhsoft.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 15:52
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appende
@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann:
> So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one
> exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a
>
Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann:
So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one
exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a
clue why. Viscerally i would say its about 20% of all mails that arent
tagged by spamassassin
how is SA integrat
Dear List,
i have an issue with spamassassin under debian wheezy (7.11) and spamassassin
version 3.3.2.
my surrounding is as follows: perimeter smtp relay1 is postfix 2.9.6-2 on
debian wheezy 7.11 (dedicated host) that transfers mails to relay2 which is
postfix 2.9.6-2 on debian wheezy 7.11 (d
On 7/2/2012 6:09 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-07-02 14:56, server skrev:
What I posted was the the exact post to my log file without breaks.
As what Dave posted it is double scanning for whatever reason.
At this point I am not sure if it is Exim or Spamassassin or both.
if both is same
Den 2012-07-02 14:56, server skrev:
What I posted was the the exact post to my log file without breaks.
As what Dave posted it is double scanning for whatever reason.
At this point I am not sure if it is Exim or Spamassassin or both.
if both is same mail, then its rescanning on return from spa
On 7/2/2012 3:28 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-07-02 05:44, server skrev:
What part of the header should I post?
does not help since problem is the above is done before spamd is called
and you pasted one ham, and one spam, check exim config, its not a
spamassassin issue
What I post
Den 2012-07-02 05:44, server skrev:
What part of the header should I post?
does not help since problem is the above is done before spamd is called
and you pasted one ham, and one spam, check exim config, its not a
spamassassin issue
Den 2012-07-02 01:17, server skrev:
I am getting this
-39.4 points, 5.2 required
and it is tagging as spam.
Why?
next week lotto numbers is ?, 42?
it pay off to show more info, paste the email in full-content on
pastebin.com and give link to this paste here, otherwise contact your
mail ad
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, server wrote:
On 7/1/2012 7:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, server wrote:
I am getting this
-39.4 points, 5.2 required
and it is tagging as spam.
Why?
We can't possibly do more than guess without seeing the actual headers on
such a message, as well as h
On 7/1/2012 7:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, server wrote:
I am getting this
-39.4 points, 5.2 required
and it is tagging as spam.
Why?
We can't possibly do more than guess without seeing the actual headers
on such a message, as well as having some information about what yo
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, server wrote:
I am getting this
-39.4 points, 5.2 required
and it is tagging as spam.
Why?
We can't possibly do more than guess without seeing the actual headers on
such a message, as well as having some information about what your MTA is
and how you have SA glued onto
I am getting this
-39.4 points, 5.2 required
and it is tagging as spam.
Why?
21 matches
Mail list logo
