Re: Tag Level for spam

Matt Kettler schrieb: Martin Hochreiter wrote: Hi! Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail as spam? (I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin) 5.0 is the "recommended" default. This level will tune SA to treat false positives (nonspam tagged as

Re: Tag Level for spam

Martin Hochreiter wrote: > Hi! > > Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail > as spam? > > (I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin) > 5.0 is the "recommended" default. This level will tune SA to treat false positives (nonspam tagged as spam) as rough

Re: Tag Level for spam

Martin Hochreiter schrieb: Hi! Hello! Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail as spam? perhaps the default is recommended? (I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin) I think that ... strongly depends. e.g.: What rules you use, which blacklist

Tag Level for spam

Hi! Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail as spam? (I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin) lg martin