to turn on collected points check after
[prioritized rules + header rules] (and inside body rules), without any
sorting if this is undesirable.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Suggestion-to-developers-tf4429767.html#a12674988
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Jason Burzenski wrote:
How would you account for negative scoring rules? (if your message hit's
score=5 it may soon be socre=-2 after a negative scoring rule is
applied).
It is stupid simple - run them first. :)
--
Michał Jęczalik, +48.603.64.62.97
INFONAUTIC, +48.33.487.6
On 9/13/07, Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> if anyone feels like trying it out to see if they can make an
> auto-shortcircuiting plugin which outperforms base SpamAssassin over a
> mixed corpus of 50:50 nonspam and spam, go for it ;)
I dunno about your mail, but if it outperformed base
Matt's generally nailed it.
I would say that it should be easy enough to write a plugin which reorders
rule priorities into a desired order, then implements the
"have_shortcircuited" plugin hook to return 1 at the desired point... so
if anyone feels like trying it out to see if they can make an
a
Crocomoth wrote:
> Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
>>> 1. Using this method, admin must understand that the fate of every
>>> message
>>> (for all users) will depend from the single rule.
>>>
>> Not if you set it up properly.. You can have multiple rules run with a
>> very early priority (low nu
riority is about the
> best you can do. You have to make those manual decisions.
>
> Now, it's possible for the devs to be the deciders, not the end-admins,
> but someone has to manually prioritize.
>
Thank you.
I just want to draw attention of developers to this problem.
Every
Crocomoth wrote:
> Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
>> SA 3.2.x already does this, you just need to know how. Read the docs on
>> the shortcircuit plugin, and the "priority" option for rules:
>>
>> Shortcircuit allows you to define when to "bail out"
>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_
evelop his own rulesets with shortcircuit involved to get really good
and reliable results. But, he could be able to turn some option in config
file and restart SA.
3. Method proposed by me is not mutually exclusive with shortcircuit. They
could work together.
Thanks.
--
View this message in cont
Henrik Krohns writes:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:53:10AM -0700, Crocomoth wrote:
> > > The most effective way I've found to lower the SA footprint is to limit
> > > the mail that gets to it by using some triage on the MTA side. SA as a
> > > standalone tool might benefit from some kind of triag
age
would be dropped without further scanning.
-Original Message-
From: Crocomoth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Suggestion to developers
SpamAssassin is a really great product.
But, it is perl-based and
Crocomoth wrote:
> SpamAssassin is a really great product.
> But, it is perl-based and checks every message with a lot of (all) rules (,
> always!).
> Volume of spam is constantly increasing, as well as CPU and memory load that
> SA creates on servers.
> As a SA user, I would be happy to have the f
dropped.
As far as I see, SA just adds 100 points to this message and continues
checking.
And I am not sure about the order of rules in checking process.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Suggestion-to-developers-tf4429767.html#a12638431
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ad a designated file before it reads others).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Crocomoth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:42 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Suggestion to developers
>
>
> SpamAssassin is a really grea
ED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Suggestion to developers
SpamAssassin is a really great product.
But, it is perl-based and checks every message with a lot of (all) rules (,
always!).
Volume of spam is constantly increasing, as well as CPU and
-to-developers-tf4429767.html#a12637043
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 matches
Mail list logo
