David B Funk said:
>geocities is pretty good about taking crap down once they're notified,
Yes... but it often takes them a couple of days to get this done... even
when kiddy pron is involved.
I wish geocities would respond faster to such complaints.
Also, much higher volumes of spam mail with g
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Well when they can sell spams that don't advertise a web site
> for the same price as those that do, let us know. Until
> then SURBLs have them.
>
> Jeff C.
OK, how about 419'ers or stock scammers?
The child porn sites that use: http://beam.to/adultworld
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005, 9:02:44 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
SURBLs have them... most of the time... eventually... Er, yeah.
Just to check, are you using ob.surbl.org and jp.surbl.org
in multi.surbl.org, i.e.:
In the last ~24 hours:
All SA > 5: 32540
*_SURBL:22361 (69%
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005, 9:02:44 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> SURBLs have them... most of the time... eventually... Er, yeah.
Just to check, are you using ob.surbl.org and jp.surbl.org
in multi.surbl.org, i.e.:
urirhssub URIBL_JP_SURBL multi.surbl.org.A 64
body URIBL_JP_SURBL
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Hey, SURBLs are GREAT, no doubt about it but lets not kid ourselves.
It is a long way from a 100% spam solution.
I think Jeff's point is that SURBL is one test spammers have a limited
ability to adapt to without cutting into their bottom line. Not that
it's perfect.
Jeff Chan wrote:
Well when they can sell spams that don't advertise a web site
for the same price as those that do, let us know. Until
then SURBLs have them.
SURBLs have them... most of the time... eventually... Er, yeah.
Hey, SURBLs are GREAT, no doubt about it but lets not kid ourselves. It
i
On Monday, March 14, 2005, 10:31:29 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I am 100% certain that there are spammers subscribed to this list, or are
> getting the messages in some manner or another. It's rather obvious why
> they do it. Spam tools seem to quickly adapt to subjects discussed here.
> List harv
At 11:53 PM 3/14/2005, Greg Allen wrote:
Yep, I just found the culprit.
The below 2 websites volunteer SA users-list email addresses for all the
world to harvest. I found my email address in Google from posting here on
this list.
One of many.. As I pointed out before, there's probably multiple spam
Mike Burger wrote:
> The second link definitely gets you to, what appear to be, the raw list
> archive files.
I did not see any "raw list archives" at this moment. But I did see
the mail address in the mail archives here. This one for example.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/mail/users/200503
At 11:35 PM 3/14/2005, Greg Allen wrote:
Does posting to this list open me up to dweebs harvesting email addresses?
Without a doubt, yes.
I am 100% certain that there are spammers subscribed to this list, or are
getting the messages in some manner or another. It's rather obvious why
they do it.
o:
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:53 PM
Subject: RE: Sudden spam to this email address
Yep, I just found the culprit.
The below 2 websites volunteer SA users-list email addresses for all the
world to harvest. I found my email address in Google from posting here on
this list.
aspn.activestate.com/
this year. One.
I can't shout from the roof tops loudly or often enough: "SpamAssassin
works!" :-)
Thomas
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:53 PM
Subject: RE: Sudden spam to this email add
, if you post to this list use a throw-away email address unless
you are looking to have a good test account for SA. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:36 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Sudden spam to this
Does posting to this list open me up to dweebs harvesting email addresses?
I'm suddenly getting BS spams to this email address, and they have to be
coming from one of two sources. This list being one of the options.
Thanks.
14 matches
Mail list logo
