On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:38:37 -0700
Richard Doyle wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 11:23 AM, RW wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:47 -0400
> > Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> so here is my observation is that when email come spamd does less
> >> rules checking or something??? vs when i ran it man
On 03/23/2012 11:23 AM, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:47 -0400
Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
so here is my observation is that when email come spamd does less
rules checking or something??? vs when i ran it manually via sa-learn
it yell a lot more rules being detected.
could it be that there
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:47 -0400
Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
>
> so here is my observation is that when email come spamd does less
> rules checking or something??? vs when i ran it manually via sa-learn
> it yell a lot more rules being detected.
>
> could it be that there is something i did not se
Well, I don't know who 'we' is but I know the author quite well, no
wonder since it's me ;-)
Go ahead an add a new code section to the wiki. (There are versions vor
3.0 and 3.1.x, yours would be for 3.1.3). In any case keep the other code.
Testers are always welcome. What would interest me is y
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Further, I don't know why it even uses it's own DNS resolver. It
would make much more sense to use SA's and do all this in the background.
I'm just assuming that the original author wasn't aware of it's
existence or w
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Further, I don't know why it even uses it's own DNS resolver. It would
make much more sense to use SA's and do all this in the background.
I'm just assuming that the original author wasn't aware of it's
existence or was too lazy to be bother
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
|| 5;
+ my $timer =
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout->new({ secs =>
$timeout
});
+ my $err = $time->run_and_catch(sub {
+ $answer =
I assume you mean $timer-> (vs $time->) there?
D
This diff seems to work. I'm going
> || 5;
> + my $timer =
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout->new({ secs =>
> $timeout
> });
> + my $err = $time->run_and_catch(sub {
> + $answer =
I assume you mean $timer-> (vs $time->) there?
D
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Does this patch below look even vaguely correct ? (and of course the
same loop around hash 2 etc)
I've just had my first brief (20 second) look at this plugin code. Your
patch looks reasonable. You'll also need to lose the current alarm
stuff near the end though:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
well, the pyzor/razor plugins now (svn) use the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout code, instead of
M::SA::Util->trap_sigalrm_fully
i'm not sure if that would help or not, but you'd have to be runn
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
well, the pyzor/razor plugins now (svn) use the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout code, instead of
M::SA::Util->trap_sigalrm_fully
i'm not sure if that would help or not, but you'd have to be runn
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
well, the pyzor/razor plugins now (svn) use the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout code, instead of
M::SA::Util->trap_sigalrm_fully
i'm not sure if that would help or not, but you'd have to be running
something newer than 3.
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
well, the pyzor/razor plugins now (svn) use the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout code, instead of
M::SA::Util->trap_sigalrm_fully
i'm not sure if that would help or not, but you'd have to be running
something newer than 3.1.3.
anyways, check by
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 14:42
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange problem
>
> Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> >> -Original Me
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
Both servers have exactly the same config except for
the
auto-learn
and bayes/user prefs are stored in mysql on the FreeBSD server.
Thanks to all who replied.
I found the problem and it's related to ixhash, the
tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 14:18
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange problem
>
> Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Dallas, I think the problem
And take a look at how fast DNS is
for you
Dirk
Dallas Engelken schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July
10, 2006 11:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange problem
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
how fast DNS is
for you
Dirk
Dallas Engelken schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange problem
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Both servers h
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange problem
>
> Sanford Whiteman wrote:
> >> Both servers have exact
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Both servers have exactly the same config except for the auto-learn
and bayes/user prefs are stored in mysql on the FreeBSD server.
Thanks to all who replied.
I found the problem and it's related to ixhash, the timeout doesn't work
correctly / work at all.
I see
jdow wrote:
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I'm having a strange problem on one of my spamd servers since
upgrading to 3.1.3.
After awhile under heavy load, children are not exiting, ie the log
show BBBIII, and eventually it's all B.
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a strange problem on one of my spamd servers since upgrading
to 3.1.3.
What version were you running previously on this host? Upgrade, or wipe
and clean install?
After awhile under heavy load, children are not exiting, ie the log show
BBBIII
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I'm having a strange problem on one of my spamd servers since upgrading
to 3.1.3.
After awhile under heavy load, children are not exiting, ie the log show
BBBIII, and eventually it's all B.
I've s
Hi,
I'm having a strange problem on one of my spamd servers since upgrading
to 3.1.3.
After awhile under heavy load, children are not exiting, ie the log show
BBBIII, and eventually it's all B.
I've started hupping the server every night but I do not have the s
Hi,
i've been running spamassassin sucessfully on a suse 8.0 with postfix
and cyrus-imap for quite a while, but ever so often i hit the
following snag:
after a reboot, spamd wouldnt start.
the init script i'm using:
<-- cut -->
#! /bin/sh
# Copyright (c) 1995-2002 SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, Ge
On 10/13/2004 12:41 AM +0200, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
I'm running spamd on it's own server with the following command line
(under daemontools)
exec /usr/local/bin/spamd -q -x -m 10 --max-conn-per-child=20 -i
206.123.6.18 -A 206.123.6.19,206.123.6.18,216.162.64.120 -u Spamd 2>&1
Try this as yo
Hi,
Regarding my strange problem of spamd writing to /root/.spamassassin
instead of /home/Spamd/.spamassassin, it seems that the -u parameter to
spamd can NOT follow a -i parameter. If it does, spamd runs as root
instead of the user specified with the -u parameter.
Just FYI.
Regards,
Rick
Hi,
I'm running spamd on it's own server with the following command line
(under daemontools)
exec /usr/local/bin/spamd -q -x -m 10 --max-conn-per-child=20 -i
206.123.6.18 -A 206.123.6.19,206.123.6.18,216.162.64.120 -u Spamd 2>&1
@4000416c5cba146a3c04 Cannot open bayes databases
/root/.spam
28 matches
Mail list logo
