On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:30:15PM -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> This is a home system with only a few users. All users have "Spam" and "Ham"
> folders showing up in their email program of choice, and they just drag
> messages they do or don't like into the appropriate folders. There are
> "Oldham"
From: "Reindl Harald"
in other words a system for morons - morons which will drag mails to spam
instead click on "unsubscribe"
per-user bayes don't work well, never
Well Harald, you are certainly welcome to your opinion. It would be nicer if
you had kept it yourself though.
The system works
, and the new spam and ham (respectively) get merged into
these folders after learning, and removed from the current Spam and Ham folders.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Grant
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org ; Loren Wilton ; hg user
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 12:47
On 20 February 2023 12:28:00 CET, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> A cron job that will harvest Spam and Ham mboxes and feed them to sa-learn
> once a day, then archive the learned messages. Per-user bayes and learning.
> Mail is hand-moved into the spam and ham learning folders, and for my
> personal
> Can you please give me some details on your bayes setup?
> Headers exclusion, bayes_token_sources, how do you "sa-learn" messages...
Standard options on Bayes. No autolearn. A cron job that will harvest Spam and
Ham mboxes and feed them to sa-learn once a day, then archive the learned
message
Can you please give me some details on your bayes setup? Headers
exclusion, bayes_token_sources, how do you "sa-learn" messages...
thank you
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:53 PM Loren Wilton wrote:
> > The real question is: has bayes still its use case in 2023 ? Is it still
> used with important sc
> The real question is: has bayes still its use case in 2023 ? Is it still used
> with important scores or just to flag messages for a review?
It works fine for me here.
>
>
> bayes_token_sources none visible uri mimepart
>
I added this line to my config with no changes in the tokens used to sum
the bayes score, headers still used. It may be a command only recognized
during learning but I should check the sources.
> perhaps OP has bayes_token_sources setting tha
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
> > Every score is based on headers, very generic headers. and some
> > related to my setup.
> >
> > Not a single token from the message body
>
> The Bayes implementation has b
I've updated 23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
(last update was from 2016 :)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
Axb
On 2/16/23 14:17, Dave Wreski wrote:
Here's also another 50+ headers we've collected over the years that I
believe started
Hi,
Here's also another 50+ headers we've collected over the years that I
believe started as a list from AXB 10+ years ago.
https://pastebin.com/raw/f6Fwh8HJ
dave
On 2/16/23 6:02 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
I was investigating a bunch of bit
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
> I was investigating a bunch of bitcoin spam: different titles,
> different senders (all from gmail), different text, different pdf
> attachment.
>
> Unfortunately in those days my bayes db was polluted and they all got
> a BAYES_50, 0.8.
>
I was investigating a bunch of bitcoin spam: different titles,
different senders (all from gmail), different text, different pdf
attachment.
Unfortunately in those days my bayes db was polluted and they all got
a BAYES_50, 0.8.
I tested the messages now with a recreated bayes db and got some
BAYE
13 matches
Mail list logo
