On 12/12/15 23:43, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On December 12, 2015 8:33:28 PM Sebastian Arcus
wrote:
I guess I must be using the default settings - as I don't think I've
configured anything in particular for AWL
change default /16 cidr to new default /24 for ipv4, for ipv6 use /64,
if you like
On 12/12/15 19:57, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/12/15 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with
the > following report:
> > -0.4 AWLAW
On December 12, 2015 8:33:28 PM Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I guess I must be using the default settings - as I don't think I've
configured anything in particular for AWL
change default /16 cidr to new default /24 for ipv4, for ipv6 use /64, if
you like to track on /32 for ipv4 then each ipv4 wil
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/12/15 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
> following report:
>
> -0.4 AWLAWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation
On 12/12/15 13:06, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Sebastian Arcus skrev den 2015-12-12 12:51:
Why
would AWL now tilt things heavily towards ham, after the message has
just been learned as spam?
its how AWL works
It seems to be making things worse instead
of better. Unless I am misunderstanding what
On 12/12/15 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
following report:
-0.4 AWLAWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation
of From: address
After learning the messages as spam
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the following
report:
-0.4 AWLAWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
address
After learning the messages as spam into bayes with sa-learn, I get the
fol
Sebastian Arcus skrev den 2015-12-12 12:51:
Why
would AWL now tilt things heavily towards ham, after the message has
just been learned as spam?
its how AWL works
It seems to be making things worse instead
of better. Unless I am misunderstanding what AWL is supposed to be
doing?
what are yo
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
following report:
Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender
