Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
- Original Message -
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
Couldn't a whitelist shortcircut option be added? What I mean is a
feature that allows an admin to direct SA to check the
whitelist/blacklist first and then (if enabled) abandon further testing
if sender is listed.
AFAIK
- Original Message -
>Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
>> Couldn't a whitelist shortcircut option be added? What I mean is a
>> feature that allows an admin to direct SA to check the
>> whitelist/blacklist first and then (if enabled) abandon further testing
>if sender is listed.
>
>AFAIK there's no re
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
Couldn't a whitelist shortcircut option be added? What I mean is a feature
that allows an admin to direct SA to check the whitelist/blacklist first
and then (if enabled) abandon further testing if sender is listed.
AFAIK there's no reason why you can't do that already, pro
- Original Message -
>Paolo De Marco wrote:
>> Hi.
>> There is a way to stop tests when the score of the mail is higher then
>> a value?
>>
>Not in a general sense, but there is a shortcircuit plugin that can be
>used to stop checking when a particular rule hits.
>You can also use the rule
false positives, I then break out of further testing and
clasify the email as spam.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Stop-tests-when-score-is-high-tp14432409p14437413.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Paolo De Marco wrote:
> Hi.
> There is a way to stop tests when the score of the mail is higher then
> a value?
>
Not in a general sense, but there is a shortcircuit plugin that can be
used to stop checking when a particular rule hits.
You can also use the rule priority to cause the trusted shortci
Hi.
There is a way to stop tests when the score of the mail is higher then a
value?
