Re: Spamtraps

2008-12-12 Thread mouss
Marcin Krol a écrit : > Henrik K wrote: > sure there's other useful stuff you can do with spamtrap mails too. >> >> Unfortunately it takes a lot of effort to create *good* spamtraps. > > Yep. > >> It's just >> too much trouble for a normal adm

Re: Spamtraps - how to ?

2008-12-12 Thread Ned Slider
sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Hello, in one topic in the past - some users had an discussion about spamtraps. Is there any chance to get a "how to start a spamtrap with spamassassin" ? thx Sebastian Here's one approach: http:/

Re: Spamtraps

2008-12-12 Thread Ned Slider
Marcin Krol wrote: Henrik K wrote: sure there's other useful stuff you can do with spamtrap mails too. Unfortunately it takes a lot of effort to create *good* spamtraps. Yep. It's just too much trouble for a normal admin, I leave it to those who have time on their hands. You

Spamtraps - how to ?

2008-12-12 Thread sebast...@debianfan.de
Hello, in one topic in the past - some users had an discussion about spamtraps. Is there any chance to get a "how to start a spamtrap with spamassassin" ? thx Sebastian

Re: Spamtraps (was: Increasing SA effectiveness)

2008-12-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Marcin Krol wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:43:57 +0100: > posted spamtraps to Usenet some 6 months ago and I > still get very little spam caught in spamtraps. you will have to exclude them from RBL blocking, of course ;-) I have one Usenet spamtrap that is getting a lot of spam, altho

Spamtraps (was: Increasing SA effectiveness)

2008-12-12 Thread Marcin Krol
Henrik K wrote: sure there's other useful stuff you can do with spamtrap mails too. Unfortunately it takes a lot of effort to create *good* spamtraps. Yep. It's just too much trouble for a normal admin, I leave it to those who have time on their hands. You can do the simpl

Re: somone running spamtraps?

2008-04-05 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Friday 04 April 2008 15:05:37 Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > I wouldn't do that: you risk your own inet address to be reported as a spam > source: most spamtraps are not smart enough to understand you are trying to > help... It's ok. we're going to throw that domain awa

Re: somone running spamtraps?

2008-04-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, April 4, 2008 12:59, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: > we've got a domain that got joe jobed. > and found a spam worm on some faildows machine. > where do i send those? I mean, maybe somone can make use of it. http://www.clamav.org/ submit a file lets kill that worm now :=) Benny Pederse

RE: somone running spamtraps?

2008-04-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Original Message- > From: Arvid Ephraim Picciani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 1:00 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: somone running spamtraps? > > we've got a domain that got joe jobed. > and found a spam

somone running spamtraps?

2008-04-04 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
we've got a domain that got joe jobed. and found a spam worm on some faildows machine. where do i send those? I mean, maybe somone can make use of it. -- best regards Arvid Ephraim Picciani

Re: Re: OT: Spamtraps

2007-09-21 Thread François Rousseau
Well normally you tried to keep your spamtraps secret. You want to be 100% sure that all email coming true is really spams. 2007/9/20, Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Or, better yet, just change the name on the email to lines when you > complain to many isp's. >

RE: Re: OT: Spamtraps

2007-09-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
Or, better yet, just change the name on the email to lines when you complain to many isp's. They forward those to the spammers who happily add you to their 'known valid email address list'. Also, google for various opt-out pages. You opt out of the wrong page, you know you will get spam. Also,

Re: OT: Spamtraps

2007-09-20 Thread NFN Smith
domains get varying amounts of regular traffic addressed to addresses that have never been valid. I convert those to spamtraps. In particular, I find it useful to watch the take on munged versions of valid addresses, as that tends to be a good indicator of the pattern of stuff that's act

R: Spamtraps

2007-09-18 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Andy Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 17:41 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > It may take a couple of years for a trap to activate, but eventually > > they will. > > I'm not an expert on this, so looking forward to better methods as

Re: OT: Spamtraps

2007-09-18 Thread Kelson
ram wrote: How can I best create spamtrap ids. Some ideas: Keep those published-on-the-web spamtraps, and have some patience. They'll pick them up eventually. Use a future spamtrap on a mailing list for a week or two, making sure to put the address in your signature, then unsubscri

Re: Spamtraps

2007-09-18 Thread Andy Sutton
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 17:41 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > It may take a couple of years for a trap to activate, but eventually > they will. > I'm not an expert on this, so looking forward to better methods as > well in this thread. One thing I chuckle at is that spammers fat finger addresses l

Re: OT: Spamtraps

2007-09-18 Thread Matt
> Sorry this is OT. > > We run large email setups for our clients and I also have created many > spamtrap ids. But the problem is I dont seem to get many mails in these > ids > How can I best create spamtrap ids. > > The standard methods of publishing ids on your site etc doesnt seem to > work Try

OT: Spamtraps

2007-09-18 Thread ram
Sorry this is OT. We run large email setups for our clients and I also have created many spamtrap ids. But the problem is I dont seem to get many mails in these ids How can I best create spamtrap ids. The standard methods of publishing ids on your site etc doesnt seem to work Thanks Ram

Re: "promoting spamtraps"

2006-01-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
[shifting to users@ since it's not a dev@ issue] On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 07:31:45PM -0800, Loren Wilton wrote: > Actually, while he phrased the RFE in terms of sa-learn, it is actually > something that could be done as an SA plugin, if SA were run on the > spamtrap. Sure, it'd be pretty trivial t