This line from the article:
Image spam can also tax e-mail systems because each message is about
7.5 times larger than regular spam, Sprosts said.
...reminds me of an old(ish) saying I once read:
"A picture had better be worth a thousand words -- it takes up a lot
more disk space!"
--
Kelson
On Thursday 29 June 2006 21:04, Thomas Raef wrote:
> I'm sure you've read this by now, but as this has been a topic in this
> group I thought it was at least worth bringing to everyone's attention:
>
>
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/computersecurity/wormsviruses/2006-06-
> 28-spam-images_x.h
I’m sure you’ve read this by now, but as this
has been a topic in this group I thought it was at least worth bringing to
everyone’s attention:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/computersecurity/wormsviruses/2006-06-28-spam-images_x.htm
Thomas J. Raef
e-Based Security, Inc.
www.
