Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Cliff Stanford wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Justin Mason wrote:
> >
> > > Yes -- in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, it's picking up a more useful score:
> > > 0.509 in set 1 and 0.905 in set 3. (Not a huge score, but that's
> > > where the
Cliff Stanford wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
Yes -- in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, it's picking up a more useful score:
0.509 in set 1 and 0.905 in set 3. (Not a huge score, but that's
where the GA set it... its optimal score, given FPs and other
rules it ov
>
> I've just spotted a major flaw then that's going to hit me when this
> changes.
>
> Not being an ISP, I have no idea what my users' IP addresses are at any
> given time. They authenticate when using SMTP so that I will accept and
> forward the mail but may well be using an ISP dial-up or DSL
Justin Mason wrote:
> Matt Kettler writes:
>
>> However, be aware that I'm merely a "helpful community member" and my
>> opinions on the list uses are purely non-official.
>>
>
> But almost always right ;)
>
That's partly because of knowledge, and partly because I'm good at
constructing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
> Yes -- in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, it's picking up a more useful score:
> 0.509 in set 1 and 0.905 in set 3. (Not a huge score, but that's
> where the GA set it... its optimal score, given FPs and other
> rules it overlaps with.)
I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler wrote:
> However, be aware that I'm merely a "helpful community member" and my
> opinions on the list uses are purely non-official.
Thank you, that was all very helpful.
Cliff.
- --
Cliff Stanford
Might Limited
Matt Kettler writes:
> Cliff Stanford wrote:
> > Some questions:
> >
> > 1. RCVD_IN_XBL
> >
> > Why is this only applied by default to -lastexternal rather than all the
> > Received: lines? Surely if any forwarding host is a known exploit, it
> > should score the same 3.897 ?
> The problem her
Cliff Stanford wrote:
> Some questions:
>
> 1. RCVD_IN_XBL
>
> Why is this only applied by default to -lastexternal rather than all the
> Received: lines? Surely if any forwarding host is a known exploit, it
> should score the same 3.897 ?
The problem here is that XBL will generally consist of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some questions:
1. RCVD_IN_XBL
Why is this only applied by default to -lastexternal rather than all the
Received: lines? Surely if any forwarding host is a known exploit, it
should score the same 3.897 ?
2. RCVD_IN_PBL
This is (IMHO) correctly
