Re: Spamd Child Forks, and scaling problems

2006-02-02 Thread Andrew Donkin
Ray wrote: >> spamd: handled cleanup of child pid 19888 due to SIGCHLD >> spamd[5262]: prefork: child states: II Ray, the one you want to look for is "prefork: server reached --max-clients setting, consider raising it". If you see that, you may want to look at your free RAM and, well, consider

Re: Spamd Child Forks

2006-02-02 Thread Mike Jackson
spamd: handled cleanup of child pid 19888 due to SIGCHLD spamd[5262]: prefork: child states: II I see a lot of mention of these messages showing up in 3.1, but I have not seen a definitive answer as to if I need to pay more attention to them or they are just a minor/visual annoyance in the logs a

Spamd Child Forks

2006-02-02 Thread Ray Dzek
spamd: handled cleanup of child pid 19888 due to SIGCHLD spamd[5262]: prefork: child states: II   I see a lot of mention of these messages showing up in 3.1, but I have not seen a definitive answer as to if I need to pay more attention to them or they are just a minor/visual annoyance in the