Julian Yap wrote:
> I've tried doing some tests in debugging mode. How do you record
> timings for the SA parts in debugging mode?
>
This may offer an idea:
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-user&m=116108763611148
Gary V
_
i'm making a
Julian Yap wrote:
> I'm finding that using FreeBSD 6.2 (64-bit kernel) is having much
> faster scan times then any GNU/Linux system I've run.
>
For such a large difference (0.4 vs 10) it has to be DNS related.
I'll take a stab: ipv6. If you have ipv6 enabled, Linux will attempt to
do ipv6 DNS look
On Monday 26 March 2007 06:34, Julian Yap wrote:
> On 3/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One thing I would check is to make sure your malloc options are sensible.
> >
> > I have seen Perl benchmarks where subtle malloc options can have a huge
> > neg/pos impact on performance.
On 3/25/07, Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Julian Yap wrote:
> I've tried doing some tests in debugging mode. How do you record
> timings for the SA parts in debugging mode?
>
I think spamd -D.
Hmm, I don't recall seeing timings. I might be wrong or it could be
the first column.
Julian Yap wrote:
Are you using pyzor,razor or dcc?
Razor and DCC. I should try disabling both of these.
I don't think you need to, but if you like 2 second emails ;-) set the
timeouts to 1 second or less .
(i think default is 5 seconds each)
I've tried doing some tests in debugging mode
On 3/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I would check is to make sure your malloc options are sensible.
I have seen Perl benchmarks where subtle malloc options can have a huge
neg/pos impact on performance.
I'll need to look into this. Malloc options are Kernel level,
On 3/25/07, Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 2:58 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Spamassassin scanning slo
On Sunday 25 March 2007 21:07, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> My assumptions are that Linux should be better/faster at disk access
> (which includes spooling email, mime defang, virus scan, and sql access)
Uhh why?
> My other assumptions are that FBSD network drivers are faster, but in a
> heavy emai
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 2:58 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Spamassassin scanning slower on Linux compared to FreeBSD
>
>
> I have common hard
I have common hardware being Dual AMD64 CPU's with 4GB of RAM.
Running Spamassassin 3.0.4 with exactly the same rules and setup.
Running between 7 and 15 child processes.
I'm finding that using FreeBSD 6.2 (64-bit kernel) is having much
faster scan times then any GNU/Linux system I've run.
Here
10 matches
Mail list logo
