On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Angus Dunn wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for your help!
>
> I have changed procmailrc to the following:
> DROPPRIVS=yes
> :0fw
> * < 512000
> | /usr/bin/spamc
>
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
> /dev/null
>
> It is now working fine.
>
> Someone mentioned that i can a
Quoting Angus Dunn :
Thanks everyone for your help!
I have changed procmailrc to the following:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* < 512000
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
It is now working fine.
Someone mentioned that i can actually invoke spamassassin directly from
se
default has been 500 kByte for a long time, and was 250 kByte
>> before. That line looks like an obvious *typo* to me. An ancient one.
>
> Add another zero and it would have been about 256Kb.
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-not-tagging-some-emails-tp26019435p26034712.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 16:11 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
> > Quoting Karsten Bräckelmann :
> > > > : 0fw
> > > > * < 25600
> > > > | /usr/bin/spamc
> > >
> > > That's 25 kByte! Yes, that is your problem. Any mail larger than that
> > > will NOT b
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
Quoting Karsten Bräckelmann :
> But this does not help. The spam emails still did not get tag.
>
> 2. I am using procmailrc to invoke spamassassin.
> Here is the /etc/procmailrc:
> DROPPRIVS=yes
> : 0fw
> * < 25600
> | /usr/bin/spamc
That'
Quoting Karsten Bräckelmann :
But this does not help. The spam emails still did not get tag.
2. I am using procmailrc to invoke spamassassin.
Here is the /etc/procmailrc:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* < 25600
| /usr/bin/spamc
That's 25 kByte! Yes, that is your problem. Any mail larger than that
will N
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 15:12 -0700, Angus Dunn wrote:
> Thank you for the useful tips. I have tried the following:
> 1. trusted_networks/internal_networks - I checked the conf file for
> spamassassin /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, there is no reference to
> trusted_networks or internal_networks. I
Quoting Angus Dunn :
2. I am using procmailrc to invoke spamassassin.
Here is the /etc/procmailrc:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* < 25600
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
~
As someone suggested, this may be due to size of the email. It looks like
spamassassion will not
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Angus Dunn wrote:
:0fw
* < 25600
| /usr/bin/spamc
*chuckle* Yeah, that'd do it all right.
It looks like spamassassion will not be invoked if email is larger than
25600 bytes.
Correct.
:0fw
* < 102400
| /usr/bin/spamc
100KB is still rather small for an email with s
< 25600
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
~
As someone suggested, this may be due to size of the email. It looks like
spamassassion will not be invoked if email is larger than 25600 bytes.
I changed the above to the following:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* < 102400
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
That seems to fix the problem.
I also have a question:
Do i really need to check for the size of email? Should I just remove the
size check?
Thanks,
Angus
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-not-tagging-some-emails-tp26019435p26033969.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
23.10.2009 20:04, MySQL Student kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
>> SpamAssassin DOES NOT bypass scanning, if the internal or trusted
>> networks contain the server in it.
>
> Hmm.. thanks for correcting me.
>
> How would you, then, go about preventing SA from scanning the
> localhost or a specific domain w
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 13:04 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> > SpamAssassin DOES NOT bypass scanning, if the internal or trusted
> > networks contain the server in it.
>
> Hmm.. thanks for correcting me.
>
> How would you, then, go about preventing SA from scanning the
> localhost or a specific doma
Hi,
> SpamAssassin DOES NOT bypass scanning, if the internal or trusted
> networks contain the server in it.
Hmm.. thanks for correcting me.
How would you, then, go about preventing SA from scanning the
localhost or a specific domain without whitelisting that domain or
range?
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Angus Dunn wrote:
I have enabled spamassassin on my mail server. Spamassassin is correctly
tagging most of the email but some of the emails are not.
The correctly tagged emails has the following in the email headers:
Received: from inspiron1505 (titanium [127.0.0.1])
23.10.2009 4:52, MySQL Student kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
> On the message that should have been scanned:
>
>> The emails that has not been tagged at all:
>
> [...]
>> From: "Angus - 3idea"
>> To:
>
> Are you forwarding this spam from your internal account to this other
> internal supp...@3idea.com
Hi,
On the message that should have been scanned:
> The emails that has not been tagged at all:
[...]
> From: "Angus - 3idea"
> To:
Are you forwarding this spam from your internal account to this other
internal supp...@3idea.com account? It also looked like there was no
external mail server i
vide, please let me know.
I really appreciated your help!
Thanks,
Angus
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-not-tagging-some-emails-tp26019435p26019435.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
17 matches
Mail list logo
