jpff wrote:
Much to my regret I am having to abandon use of spamassassin. If I
include it in my mix (exin/spamassassin/clamav) then as soon it there
is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no mail is
delivered. This
This is generally a good idea and can be easily accomplished in Exim.
Just add the following condition to your spam checking ACL.
condition = ${if <{$message_size}{500k}{1}{0}}
Or be even more radical and limit it to the 200-250K recommended by SA.
Loren
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
My most recent discovery was SA hanging on huge attachments ( from
web-designers) , I'm currently TRYING to modify Exim to NOT send messages
over 500k to SA- as most spam is usually just a few k-
This is generally a good idea and can be easily accomplished in Exim.
J
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:09:07PM +0100, jpff wrote:
is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no mail is
If you're getting errors about dealing with memory, that's perl
jpff wrote:
> Much to my regret I am having to abandon use of spamassassin. If I
> include it in my mix (exin/spamassassin/clamav) then as soon it there
> is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
> deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no mail is
> delivered
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:09:07PM +0100, jpff wrote:
> is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
> deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no mail is
If you're getting errors about dealing with memory, that's perl and not
SpamAssassin. FYI.
I'm stepping
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:09:07PM +0100, jpff wrote:
> is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
> deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no mail is
If you're getting errors about dealing with memory, that's perl and not
SpamAssassin. FYI.
--
Randomly Sele
At 01:12 PM 4/17/2007, Evan Platt wrote:
This is exim 4.65/4.66/4.77 and SA 3.1.x for x in 1-8 on Debian sarge
and etch
3.1.X? Is that before or after 8?
Ok, I'm retarded. Heh.
At 12:09 PM 4/17/2007, jpff wrote:
Much to my regret I am having to abandon use of spamassassin. If I
include it in my mix (exin/spamassassin/clamav) then as soon it there
is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no ma
Much to my regret I am having to abandon use of spamassassin. If I
include it in my mix (exin/spamassassin/clamav) then as soon it there
is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no mail is
delivered. This is very depres
10 matches
Mail list logo
