On 2022-03-25 05:29, Don Saklad wrote:
Looking for a quick reference key about
understanding spamassassin headers on messages
a) for the most important spamassassin headers
b) and for all the spamassassin headers
c) spamassassin untrust all internal headers not local, eq all headers
added by
Looking for a quick reference key about
understanding spamassassin headers on messages
a) for the most important spamassassin headers
b) and for all the spamassassin headers
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:13:47 -0600
Noel wrote:
> On 1/31/2019 3:03 PM, Don Saklad wrote:
> > $ perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
> > No documentation found for "Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf".
>
>
> Apparently the docs aren't installed on your system. Perhaps
> there's a separate spamassassin-docs
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019, Noel wrote:
On 1/31/2019 3:03 PM, Don Saklad wrote:
$ perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
No documentation found for "Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf".
"Bill Cole"
writes:
This is not really possible.
Run 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassi
On 1/31/2019 3:03 PM, Don Saklad wrote:
> $ perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
> No documentation found for "Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf".
>
>
>
> "Bill Cole"
> writes:
> This is not really possible.
>
> Run 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
$ perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
No documentation found for "Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf".
"Bill Cole"
writes:
This is not really possible.
Run 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf'
Am 31.01.19 um 21:34 schrieb Don Saklad:
-Suggestion
a) Develop a List for curious new/novice end endusers of examples of
SpamAssassin Headers b) with examples of Data that can appear in the
SpamAssassin Headers. Avoid as much as possible unexplained jargon
familiar to experts of SpamAssassin.
Or encourage folks at local configurations
On 30 Jan 2019, at 20:33, Don Saklad wrote:
Thank you Martin Gregorie!
Looking for the closest thing to a list for new/novice users of all
SpamAssassin headers that can appear with descriptions for
understanding
the data that can appear at each SpamAssassin header.
This is not really
Thank you Martin Gregorie!
Looking for the closest thing to a list for new/novice users of all
SpamAssassin headers that can appear with descriptions for understanding
the data that can appear at each SpamAssassin header.
It's for new/novice users' curiosity about understanding bette
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:24 -0500, Don Saklad wrote:
> What's available to interpret spamassassin headers?
>
Why do you want to interpret them?
Once we know that we may be able to provide more sensible answers, but
in its absence all I can say is awk, C, and Perl.
Here's wha
What's available to interpret spamassassin headers?
My apologies, I didn't see a list owner or moderator header...
Can this guy please be unsubscribed?
Don Saklad wrote:
How do you use Emacs to sort RMAIL email based on spamassassin headers?...
Don Saklad wrote:
> yry ?
>
What does yry mean?
> RMAIL group ?
> Looking around for any RMAIL groups... if you happen upon any,
> please let me know...
>
Hmm, perhaps try the emacs group instead. i.e.:
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs. They don't appear
to have a separate
yry ?
RMAIL group ?
Looking around for any RMAIL groups... if you happen upon any,
please let me know...
List-Id: ?
Looking around for more information about List-Id:
Don Saklad wrote:
> How do you use Emacs to sort RMAIL email based on spamassassin headers?...
>
>
I don't think anyone here uses emacs rmail. The fact that you've
repeatedly posted this question over an 8 month timespan without getting
an answer clearly suggests that. It&#x
How do you use Emacs to sort RMAIL email based on spamassassin headers?...
.
On 17.07.08 01:51, Linspeed wrote:
> Is it OK to run sa-learn with the --spam option on messages that have
> already had the SpamAssassin message placed at the top?
yes, SA removes those headers. If there are some extra headers you want to
use, you can still use bayes_ignore_header
--
Matus UHLA
sting single session commands rather than
writing a program or dotfile for the spamassassin headers from the
system setup.
For example using Esc C-s Regexp to summarize by: rolex
C-M-s runs the command rmail-summary-by-regexp
C-M-r isearch-backward-regexp
C-M-s isearch-forward-regexp
Don Saklad wrote:
> How are SpamAssassin headers dealt with on RMAIL messages in Emacs ?...
It has been a while since I have used RMAIL but since I think that
will be true of a lot of people I decided to answer anyway. :-)
I believe the SA headers are simply ignored along with other head
How are SpamAssassin headers dealt with on RMAIL messages in Emacs ?...
using already existing EMACS commands rather than programming.
Not all new users and not all intermediate users have made their way
through a learning curve of programming techniques.
.
For users of RMAIL in EMACS not familier with programming, not
familiar with dotfiles, how can spamassassin headers be used
with EMACS or RMAIL existing commands?...
.
At 09:04 PM 12/16/2007, the zak wrote:
Around the web what resources are there for users of RMAIL in EMACS
to deal with spamassassin headers?...
Google shows quite a few...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=rmail+emacs+spamassassin&btnG=Search
Around the web what resources are there for users of RMAIL in EMACS
to deal with spamassassin headers?...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Around-the-web-what-resources-are-there-for-users-of-RMAIL-in-EMACS-to-deal-with-spamassassin-headers-...-tp14370075p14370075.html
On Sat, May 12, 2007 12:49, Alex Woick wrote:
> Is it possible to display the version and/or publishing date of the
> ruleset in the mail headers, for example in the X-Spam-Checker-Version:
> header? So we can see if the ruleset has been kept up-to-date with
> sa-update.
It could be done with a Ma
Is it possible to display the version and/or publishing date of the
ruleset in the mail headers, for example in the X-Spam-Checker-Version:
header? So we can see if the ruleset has been kept up-to-date with
sa-update.
Alex
: $sa_spam_subject_tag = 'SPAM ';
Still my tags are wrong :(
Anyone have a example of an amavisd conf file with non defaults tags?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-headers-tf2338119.html#a6542581
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
->
-> I have searched almost every where to solve this problem:
->
-> I cant change the spam headers from ***SPAM[score]*** to SPAM:
-> I am using Spamassassin 3.1.3 on perl 5.8.8
-> amavisd-new version: 2.3.3
-> SUSE SLES 10
->
-> My local.cf looks like this:
->
-> # Add your own customisation
Kim
Please forgive, I had my email client set wrong and it didn't wrap your .cf
file in the email so... it was uncommented. My fault.
Interesting though... maybe you just didn't stop and restart the service?
:-)
-rh
--
Robert - Abba Communications
Computer & Internet Services
(509) 624-7
KimSorensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have searched almost every where to solve this problem:
>
> I cant change the spam headers from ***SPAM[score]*** to SPAM:
> I am using Spamassassin 3.1.3 on perl 5.8.8
> amavisd-new version: 2.3.3
> SUSE SLES 10
>
amavis makes it's own markups.. check you amavis c
-> -Original Message-
->
-> I have searched almost every where to solve this problem:
->
-> I cant change the spam headers from ***SPAM[score]*** to SPAM:
-> I am using Spamassassin 3.1.3 on perl 5.8.8
-> amavisd-new version: 2.3.3
-> SUSE SLES 10
->
-> My local.cf looks like this:
->
00
and my amavis.conf has this line:
$sa_spam_subject_tag = 'SPAM ';
no matter what i do the spam mails are tagges as ***SPAM(_SCORE_)*** e.g ***
SPAM2 ***
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-headers-tf2338119.html#a6505938
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mai
I do have procmail setup on mail1. I didn't think of that, but thought my SMTP server would forward the message before looking at my own personal rules (the forward is in /etc/aliases).
I renamed my .procmailrc to something else so maybe that will fix it.
Also, SA does see and flag the messa
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Larry Starr wrote:
> Are you certain that SA even sees the message before it's forwarded?
>
> My first guess, without seeing config files, etc. Would be that your SMTP
> daemon (sendmail?) is forwarding the message as it's received.
This sounds like 'filtering with procmai
Are you certain that SA even sees the message before it's forwarded?
My first guess, without seeing config files, etc. Would be that your SMTP
daemon (sendmail?) is forwarding the message as it's received.
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:24, ajmcello wrote:
> I'm having an issue with SA usin
I'm having an issue with SA using two mail servers and forwarding using /etc/aliases (although .forward should produce the same result). Lets say an E-mail comes into mail1 for bob, and is flagged as spam. This part works fine.
Now, bob has a forward set up in /etc/aliases on mail1 to go to [E
Matt Kettler wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Is there a way to get the old behavior?
Short of modifying the code, I highly doubt it.
Correct. It annoyed me for about two weeks before I got used to it. I
actually prefer them there now.
Daryl
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> In upgrading to 3.1 I noticed that my spam headers are now at the top of
> the list.
>
> Is there a reason for this?
Under the thread "RE: 3.1.0 X-headers" at 9/15/2005 12:32 PM Bowie Bailey points
out:
-
It's a feature.
>From the
Hey,
In upgrading to 3.1 I noticed that my spam headers are now at the top of
the list.
Is there a reason for this?
Is there a way to get the old behavior?
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gu
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 5/11/2005 2:51 PM, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
On 5/11/2005 6:58 AM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
[snip]
Trying to figure out who/where this is happening is the exercise
Those words should be carved into stone on the doorposts of every
Tech Support cube farm and every Computer Science cl
On 5/11/2005 3:28 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
> BTW I've seen some similar messages -- as far as I can see, when it
> happens in my case, it's one of postfix, procmail or my MUA which is
> interpreting the message structure wrongly due to the whitespace
> wierdness.
That's possible too, if whitespac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BTW I've seen some similar messages -- as far as I can see, when it
happens in my case, it's one of postfix, procmail or my MUA which is
interpreting the message structure wrongly due to the whitespace
wierdness.
Since SpamAssassin 3.1.0 now puts the
On 5/11/2005 2:51 PM, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
>>On 5/11/2005 6:58 AM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
>>I haven't really looked into this much yet, but it appears
>>that some embedded CR or LF characters are getting
>>processed by SA and then fed back to Postfix, which then
>>cleans up the message and split
On 5/11/2005 3:02 PM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
> Eric A. Hall wrote:
>>I haven't really looked into this much yet, but it appears that some
>>embedded CR or LF characters are getting processed by SA and then fed back
>>to Postfix, which then cleans up the message and splits the headers where
>>it s
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 5/11/2005 6:58 AM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
I saw a SPAM message with the SPAMassassin message headers
(X-spam headers) grossly out of sequence. The message
was recognized as SPAM ... but because the X-spam headers
were written in the wrong part of the message, it was able
I g
> On 5/11/2005 6:58 AM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
>
> > I saw a SPAM message with the SPAMassassin message
> > headers (X-spam headers) grossly out of sequence. The
> > message was recognized as SPAM ... but because the
> > X-spam headers were written in the wrong part of the
> message, it was able
On 5/11/2005 6:58 AM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
> I saw a SPAM message with the SPAMassassin message headers
> (X-spam headers) grossly out of sequence. The message
> was recognized as SPAM ... but because the X-spam headers
> were written in the wrong part of the message, it was able
I get this p
Loren Wilton wrote:
You should open a Bugzilla ticket on this, and ATTACH, NOT COPY/PASTE the
ENTIRE original message as an attachment to the bug ticket. That way
someone will be able to look at it and see what is really happening.
Someone else made an eMail request for the entire message ... I se
[RESEND ... one correspondent could not read the
quoted header lines when placed following my name]
Greetings,
I saw a SPAM message with the SPAMassassin message headers
(X-spam headers) grossly out of sequence. The message
was recognized as SPAM ... but because the X-spam headers
were written in
You should open a Bugzilla ticket on this, and ATTACH, NOT COPY/PASTE the
ENTIRE original message as an attachment to the bug ticket. That way
someone will be able to look at it and see what is really happening.
Since you pasted that into the text, I have no clue on what any transport
agents or m
Greetings,
I saw a SPAM message with the SPAMassassin message headers
(X-spam headers) grossly out of sequence. The message
was recognized as SPAM ... but because the X-spam headers
were written in the wrong part of the message, it was able
to 'appear' as a non-SPAM message.
I have included all of
thank you ! i guess...
> 1. You can delete/move to folder/mark
based upon the X-Spam: Yes header
What other example or examples are there by way of
individual spamassassin hints, tips, pointers, features?...
Unrelated, but here's
y explain, more easily instruct end
users with these questions?... end users with areas of expertise not
directly applicable to...
1. What can you do with the spamassassin headers?... spamassassin
headers have appeared in the headers at the top of messages in
emacs rmail.
2. And how do you do
with areas of expertise not
directly applicable to...
1. What can you do with the spamassassin headers?... spamassassin
headers have appeared in the headers at the top of messages in
emacs rmail.
2. And how do you do the things you can do with the spamassassin
headers?...
Around the web
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Saklad wrote:
| Thank you Adam Lanier !
|
| The emacs rmail is run in a plain text terminal window with ssh to the
| university.
|
| Eli Tziperman appears to use a graphical set up.
|
No graphical setup necessary. I just followed the directions from
Thank you Tom Meunier !
How to use procmail is the next project !
In the meantime, users without any mastery can use
esc-s
rmail-summary-by-regexp
and
the keywords or partial keywords at
http://zork.net/~dsaklad/usabilityspamassassin.html
Thank you Adam Lanier !
The emacs rmail is run in a plain text terminal window with ssh to the
university.
Eli Tziperman appears to use a graphical set up.
spamassassin headers
| set up for them on the system by technophiles !?...
|
| Or it might be better just using...
| esc-s
| rmail-summary-by-regexp
|
Not using emacs/rmail myself, I don't know if this will be useful.
Also, not sure how appropos this will be for "people using emacs rma
Don Saklad wrote:
Thank you for the information folks !
Have any of you nice folks any further information or references that
would be of any use to people using emacs rmail with no mastery of
computers trying to see what they can do with the spamassassin headers
set up for them on the system by
Thank you for the information folks !
Have any of you nice folks any further information or references that
would be of any use to people using emacs rmail with no mastery of
computers trying to see what they can do with the spamassassin headers
set up for them on the system by technophiles
59 matches
Mail list logo
