FC Mario Patty wrote:
Thank-you for the advice. I downloaded those 3 packages from
http://dag.wieers.com, rebuilt, and installed them for my distro. Now
I can upgrade my spamassassin-3.2.4-1. Many thanx to all of you guys.
GBU.
FWIW you might also consider adding RPMForge/DAG as a yum or apt s
10, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Tarak Ranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:30 +0700, FC Mario Patty wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > This is my first email to this mailing list. I've been trying to
> > > upd
Hi Kris,
Thank-you for the advice. I downloaded those 3 packages from
http://dag.wieers.com, rebuilt, and installed them for my distro. Now
I can upgrade my spamassassin-3.2.4-1. Many thanx to all of you guys.
GBU.
Regards,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Kris Deugau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
FC Mario Patty wrote:
rpm -Uvh --force perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4-1.i386.rpm
spamassassin-3.2.4-1.i386.rpm
[snip]
cpan> i HTML::Parser
Try "rpm -q perl-HTML-Parser" or "rpm -q 'perl(HTML::Parser)'". You'll
either get nothing, or a version number less than SA requires. When
install
te:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > This is my first email to this mailing list. I've been trying to
> > update spamassassin from spamassassin-3.1.8-1.i386 to
> > spamassassin-3.2.4-1.i386 for my mail server since 3 days ago. The
> > operating system is RH
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:30 +0700, FC Mario Patty wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> This is my first email to this mailing list. I've been trying to
> update spamassassin from spamassassin-3.1.8-1.i386 to
> spamassassin-3.2.4-1.i386 for my mail server since 3 days ago. The
> operating
Hi guys,
This is my first email to this mailing list. I've been trying to
update spamassassin from spamassassin-3.1.8-1.i386 to
spamassassin-3.2.4-1.i386 for my mail server since 3 days ago. The
operating system is RHEL 4. When I run the rpm command:
rpm -Uvh --force perl-Mail-SpamAss
Praveen Kumar wrote:
Hi ALL,
I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's working
fine but
success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%).
How can i fine tune to get best results?
A setup that is only catching 20-25% of spam usually has a confi
On Monday 19 March 2007 09:22, ram wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:20 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> > Hi ALL,
> >
> > I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's
> > working fine but
> >
> > success rate of spam-detection is
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:20 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's
> working fine but
>
> success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%).
>
> How can i fine tune to get best resu
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Txs John for your quick resp.
>
> Yes, i did installing of all the plugins thru CPAN
> do i need to set path of these .pm files anywhere in any of conf files so
> that spamassassing looks that specific path for plugins?
The plugins just use other sof
Txs John for your quick resp.
Yes, i did installing of all the plugins thru CPAN
do i need to set path of these .pm files anywhere in any of conf files so
that spamassassing looks that specific path for plugins?
Could you please help me in training bayes?
Can somebody share the configuration fi
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> use_razor2 1
Did you actually install and configure razor?
Having the plugin is not enough.
Also, you have to train bayes with a couple hundred spams
and hams (specifically telling it which is which) before it
becomes effective.
--
___
Hi ALL,
I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's working
fine but
success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%).
How can i fine tune to get best results?
TIA,
My conf files below:
local.cf :-
# This is the right place to customize your in
> downloaded Mail-SpamassAssin-3.1.8.tar.gz and installed by perl Makefile.PL
> / make / make install
> stopped the current spamd and restarted and it shows that 3.1.7 in the
> header.
>
> TIA
Some distros, most annoyingly Suse insist that spamd be in a different
directory than the d
> I have upgraded spamassassin from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 and have a easy
> quiestion,
> When I look at the headers it still shows that Spamassassin 3.1.7 is
> installed / running
> Why is that? I did the following --> downloaded Mail-SpamassAssin-
> 3.1.8.tar.gz and installed
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:08:59PM -0600, SAtalk Mail User wrote:
> stopped the current spamd and restarted and it shows that 3.1.7 in the header.
I would guess that your install didn't happen correctly. Sounds like you have
one version installed and probably installed 3.1.8 to a different locati
Hello All,
I have upgraded spamassassin from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 and have a easy quiestion,
When I look at the headers it still shows that Spamassassin 3.1.7 is installed
/ running
Why is that? I did the following --> downloaded Mail-SpamassAssin-3.1.8.tar.gz
and installed
by perl Makefile
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.8 is now available! This is a maintenance and
security release of the 3.1.x branch. It is highly recommended that
people upgrade to this version.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200702131100
The release file will also
19 matches
Mail list logo
