Thanks to all who replied.
Unfortunately it appears that I'll have to update more than I wanted at one
time.
It does, however, seem worth the effort, based on the testing that I've been
doing with SA 3.0. It's tagging about 50% of the mail that is passing all of
my filters with with SA 2.6, an
Justin Mason wrote:
Well, it would be *nice*. I think it's reasonable to assume
that MIMEDefang and amavisd certainly need this, given the very
large amount of bug reports we've been getting.
Yes, it does make sense for MIMEDefang to list what version of
SpamAssassin is supported. I do not u
Justin Mason said:
> Well, it would be *nice*. I think it's reasonable to assume
> that MIMEDefang and amavisd certainly need this, given the very
> large amount of bug reports we've been getting.
We'll just make a wiki entry and naturally the popular software will be
updated with info on 3.0 c
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:21:44PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> Well, it would be *nice*. I think it's reasonable to assume
> that MIMEDefang and amavisd certainly need this, given the very
> large amount of bug reports we've been getting.
So long as our notes state that we don't actively follow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:07:08PM -0700, Kelson wrote:
> > (Developers: It might be worth mentioning the minimum 3.0-compatible
> > versions for MD, Amavis, and other popular things-that-call-SA.)
>
> Why?
>
> How are deve
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:07:08PM -0700, Kelson wrote:
>
> (Developers: It might be worth mentioning the minimum 3.0-compatible
> versions for MD, Amavis, and other popular things-that-call-SA.)
>
Why?
How are developers supposed to know what "popular" versions of
software support/use SpamAss
Larry Starr wrote:
I'm currently running mimedefang 2.37. I have found no references to a
required version of Mimedefang in the docs, and would like to avoid changing
the entire world at once.
The UPGRADE file goes into this to some extent. It doesn't mention
MIMEDefang by name, but the second
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:52 -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
> I am working to upgrade spamassassin, from 2.60 to 3.0, on my RedHat 8
> Mailserver.
>
> I'm currently running mimedefang 2.37. I have found no references to a
> required version of Mimedefang in the docs, and would like to avoid changing
I am working to upgrade spamassassin, from 2.60 to 3.0, on my RedHat 8
Mailserver.
I'm currently running mimedefang 2.37. I have found no references to a
required version of Mimedefang in the docs, and would like to avoid changing
the entire world at once.
Does anyone know of any problems ru
