On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 22:50 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Pieter De Wit wrote:
> > Here is the weird part - some mail comes up as spam when I hand it over to
> > spamd, but if I take the archive file and strip the header (EHLO etc) out,
> > save it it gets a MUCH lower score - I am talking 5.7/5.0
Pieter De Wit wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am pretty sure I covered this well, but I saw some strange happenings
> over the last couple of days. I don't have access to the box to copy and
> paste the results so this goes from memory (thought I would get the ball
> rolling)
>
> I am writing my own custom
Hi Guys,
I am pretty sure I covered this well, but I saw some strange happenings
over the last couple of days. I don't have access to the box to copy and
paste the results so this goes from memory (thought I would get the ball
rolling)
I am writing my own custom milter for sendmail. I use the fo
On 10.04.08 05:47, dougp23 wrote:
> I run SA on a host-wide basis, so no per user configuration files.
why? I run spamd daemon with per-user config files, no problem.
> I fire off SA as non-root, yet my maillog keeps filling up with those
> messages about root problems, like these:
>
> config:
-milter as non root, those problems go
away. And instead I get these:
spamd: handle_user unable to find user: 'jsmith'
So not sure how I could fix this. Any ideas? Scans fine and all that.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SpamD-and-SpamC-tp16608550p16608550.html
