>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
>> "bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
>>
>> bayes_ignore_header R
From: Matt Kettler
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:49:53 -0400
Jeff Mincy wrote:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers
Jeff Mincy wrote:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
>> "bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
>>
>> bay
From: Greg Troxel
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:33:31 -0400
Jeff Mincy writes:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>> shouldn't SpamAssassins bayes mechanism just ignore the complete
>> message header and just look at the body?
Jeff Mincy writes:
>From: Matt Kettler
>Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
>
>> shouldn't SpamAssassins bayes mechanism just ignore the complete
>> message header and just look at the body?
>> This seems useful in my opinion.
>It seems like a very misguided idea to me
From: Matt Kettler
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> Hello,
>
> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
> "bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
>
> bayes_ignore_header Return-Path
...
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:00 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Is there any reason to think headers make bad tokens?
>
> For example the "X-Spam-Flag: NO" can cause Problems if you don't
> remove it before parsing and don't set it yourself. (You'll never do
> that an
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> SA extensively parses the headers. It parses *all* headers, even
>> nonstandard ones that I could randomly configure a server to add like
>> "X-Matts-funky-header: Hi!".
>
> If at a later date you add a header to the ignore list, do
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
SA extensively parses the headers. It parses *all* headers, even
nonstandard ones that I could randomly configure a server to add like
"X-Matts-funky-header: Hi!".
If at a later date you add a header to the ignore list, does Bayes
"forget" that it's pr
Matt Kettler wrote:
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
Hello,
instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
"bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
bayes_ignore_header Return-Path
bayes_ignore_header Received
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
bayes_ignore_header X-
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:41:23 +0100
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
> "bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
>
>
>
> (found on the net)
Just because you found them on the net doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Normall
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
> Hello,
>
> instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
> "bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
>
> bayes_ignore_header Return-Path
> bayes_ignore_header Received
> bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
> bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Stat
Hello,
instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
"bayes_ignore_header" and ending up in strange configs like:
bayes_ignore_header Return-Path
bayes_ignore_header Received
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Status
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
baye
13 matches
Mail list logo
