Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-20 Thread RW
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:08:54 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * David Jones : > > > Are you hitting the URIBL_BLOCKED rule? If so, please follow the > > link in that reddit article to get rid of that rule hit. This is > > very important. > > Yes, but that's not his problem -- since the URIBL

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* David Jones : > Are you hitting the URIBL_BLOCKED rule? If so, please follow the > link in that reddit article to get rid of that rule hit. This is very > important. Yes, but that's not his problem -- since the URIBL query fails in both delivery AND his test. The actual differences are that

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* W B : > Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails scores > that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's assigning as > emails come in are different from the results of running SpamAssassin -t on > that same email after the fact. So, how is SpamAssassi

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-19 Thread W B
I actually had no idea SpamAssassin could do bayesian training - I'm an idiot. Lol. Thank you for pointing that out to me! On 4/19/2017 2:56 PM, RW wrote: On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:36:24 -0400 W B wrote: Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails scores that are way low

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-19 Thread RW
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:54:03 -0400 W B wrote: > You guys are all correct. Somehow I've been overlooking that message > - I must have misread something. Either way, thank you so much for > the help; I've set up unbound, so hopefully that should solve the > issue. It probably wont. It's a significa

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-19 Thread RW
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:36:24 -0400 W B wrote: > Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails > scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores > it's assigning as emails come in are different from the results of > running SpamAssassin -t on that same email

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-19 Thread W B
W B Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:36 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: SpamAssassin scoring issues Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's assigning as emails come

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-19 Thread David Jones
>From: W B >Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:36 PM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: SpamAssassin scoring issues   >Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails >scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it&

Re: SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-19 Thread Benny Pedersen
W B skrev den 2017-04-19 20:36: https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/660n2w/spamassassin_scores_are_oddly_low_different_from/ http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block have you readed this and solved it ?

SpamAssassin scoring issues

2017-04-19 Thread W B
Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's assigning as emails come in are different from the results of running SpamAssassin -t on that same email after the fact. I'd like to avoid posting too much