Hard Coder wrote:
Hello,
I decided to benchmark the accuracy of spamassassin. Is there anything special
I should take into consideration before I start to flood with both ham and spam?
It's probably easiest if you have them on disk and use the mass-check
utility.
Hello,
I decided to benchmark the accuracy of spamassassin. Is there anything special
I should take into consideration before I start to flood with both ham and spam?
TIA,
hc
Never miss a thing. Make
At 05:31 AM 6/22/2005, Adrian Cooper wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Spamassassin for over a year now, until recently with
great success in blocking almost all spam.
For the last few weeks however a large amount of spam has been arriving
even though I set to filter on a score of -2. Previously
Adrian Cooper wrote on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:31:13 +0100:
> For the last few weeks however a large amount of spam has been arriving even
> though I set to filter on a score of -2. Previously I was blocking most spam
> on a score of 1.0
>
> This is a very aggressive setting
Indeed, *both* setti
Hi,
I have been using Spamassassin for over a year now, until recently with
great success in blocking almost all spam.
For the last few weeks however a large amount of spam has been arriving even
though I set to filter on a score of -2. Previously I was blocking most spam
on a score of 1.0
