Re: SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-05 Thread Thomas Cameron
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 12:28 -0400, Gustafson, Tim wrote: > Hi Everyone! > > I know that Bayes is "the" defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but > I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and > what their experience with it is? > > I run SA with Bayes enabled right n

RE: SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-05 Thread Dan Kohn
<tel:+1-650-327-2600> -Original Message- From: Gustafson, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 09:38 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: SpamAssassin Without Bayes > I can't comment on the effectiveness of SA without Bayes, but I ca

Re: SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-04 Thread Eric A. Hall
On 4/4/2005 12:28 PM, Gustafson, Tim wrote: > I know that Bayes is "the" defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but > I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and > what their experience with it is? I have it turned off and don't miss it. Tweaking your rules works ju

Re: SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-04 Thread Kevin Peuhkurinen
Gustafson, Tim wrote: The problem with per-user Bayes for me is that I am running SpamAssassin with spamass-milter, and my users are not savvy enough to be able to update their own Bayes databases. They don't use any shell accounts - it's all POP3 and in some cases, after the e-mail passes through

RE: SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-04 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Gustafson, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:29 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: SpamAssassin Without Bayes > > > Hi Everyone! > > I know that Bayes is "the" defacto

RE: SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-04 Thread Gustafson, Tim
> I can't comment on the effectiveness of SA without Bayes, but I can > suggest a couple of things. First, try just lowering the scores given > to Bayes a bit so that emails won't be marked as spam solely because of > Bayes.Secondly, try using per-user Bayes instead of global. It is > a

Re: SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-04 Thread Kevin Peuhkurinen
Gustafson, Tim wrote: Hi Everyone! I know that Bayes is "the" defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and what their experience with it is? I run SA with Bayes enabled right now site-wide for more than 500 e-mail accounts, and

SpamAssassin Without Bayes

2005-04-04 Thread Gustafson, Tim
Hi Everyone! I know that Bayes is "the" defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and what their experience with it is? I run SA with Bayes enabled right now site-wide for more than 500 e-mail accounts, and my problem is that