On 31-Oct-06, at 12:01 PM, Chris Szilagyi wrote:
I have SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (using spamc/spamd) installed on a Red
Hat 7.1
system, with Perl 5.6.1. We currently have SQL user prefs enabled
in a MySQL
db, and put the entries in /etc/procmailrc to enable system-wide
scanning.
My question is
On Tue, October 31, 2006 20:01, Chris Szilagyi wrote:
> the front-end for the user settings, and one of the settings is to set the
> level to "'99' => _("Don't Filter")". But I'm just trying to figure out if
> this will force SpamAssassin (spamd) to just pass the message through without
> examin
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Jim Maul wrote:
> > My question is: Are there any settings for SpamAssassin that users would
> > set
> > in their prefs, that would bypass scanning of their email? My reason for
> > asking is that if we have users that do not want any scanning, we'd like to
> > free up the
Chris Szilagyi wrote:
Hello:
I have not been able to find the answer to my question so I thought I'd try
this mailing list.
I have SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (using spamc/spamd) installed on a Red Hat 7.1
system, with Perl 5.6.1. We currently have SQL user prefs enabled in a MySQL
db, and put the entr
Hello:
I have not been able to find the answer to my question so I thought I'd try
this mailing list.
I have SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (using spamc/spamd) installed on a Red Hat 7.1
system, with Perl 5.6.1. We currently have SQL user prefs enabled in a MySQL
db, and put the entries in /etc/procmailrc t
