Re: Spam with two subject headers

2006-11-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:35:38AM -0800, Andrew Hawthorne wrote: > Any chance spamd is not processing the same? > Perhaps a clever spammer trick? Anything's possible, but I would find it unlikely to be either of those two. You could test though by shoving a message through spamc/spamd and see if

RE: Spam with two subject headers

2006-11-16 Thread Andrew Hawthorne
r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:06 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Spam with two subject headers > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:43:52AM -0800, Andrew Hawthorne wrote: > > I'm running Spam

Re: Spam with two subject headers

2006-11-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:43:52AM -0800, Andrew Hawthorne wrote: > I'm running SpamAssassin 3.1.3 on Qmail. What does that mean exactly? qmail-scanner ? > Here are two links to the headers of two of these spams: spam_1 > spam_2

Spam with two subject headers

2006-11-16 Thread Andrew Hawthorne
Hello, I'm running SpamAssassin 3.1.3 on Qmail. 99% of the spam that is processed by SA has the subject header rewritten. A few times a day however, there are spams that get processed by SA, and do not have the 'detected spam' string in the subject. In these spam there are two S