Re: Spam with HUGE negative scores

2008-12-29 Thread Michael Scheidell
As with other suggestions, don't whitelist your own domain (usually the problem) you might post an email to your web site in whole (DON'T POST IT TO THIS GROUP! MESSES THINGS UP) also, SA and Razor are keep upto date on Freebsd (I am the ports maintainer for SA), and you won't get any upda

Re: Spam with HUGE negative scores

2008-12-29 Thread mouss
Frank DeChellis a écrit : > Hi there, > > We use SA 3.2.1 on FreeBSD 6.1. We have Bayes and Razor in use. > > Lately, 3 weeks or so, we’ve been getting HUGE negative scores on our > spam. And it’s coming in by the truck load. We use Sa-Update to update > our rules from saupdates.openprotect.co

Re: Spam with HUGE negative scores

2008-12-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.12.08 08:10, Frank DeChellis wrote: > Lately, 3 weeks or so, we¹ve been getting HUGE negative scores on our spam. which scores were in progress? > And it¹s coming in by the truck load. We use Sa-Update to update our rules > from saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org > > H

Re: Spam with HUGE negative scores

2008-12-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, December 29, 2008 14:10, Frank DeChellis wrote: > Lately, 3 weeks or so, we¹ve been getting HUGE negative scores on > our spam. no evidence, no help spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t sa.log post sa.log to a pastebin site and give us the url here -- Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www

Spam with HUGE negative scores

2008-12-29 Thread Frank DeChellis
Hi there, We use SA 3.2.1 on FreeBSD 6.1. We have Bayes and Razor in use. Lately, 3 weeks or so, we¹ve been getting HUGE negative scores on our spam. And it¹s coming in by the truck load. We use Sa-Update to update our rules from saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org Has anybo