On Friday, September 8, 2006 at 4:09:55 PM, Bowie confabulated:
> Ok, I'll give you that one. I tend to forget about that limitation
> since I mostly work with linux.
We migrated away from Windows to FreeBSD about three months ago mostly
because of tools that were readily available to the
n\perl.exe c:\perl\bin\spamassassin'.
>>
>> The same would hold true for 'sa-learn' as would 'sa-update'.
>
> Ok, I'll give you that one. I tend to forget about that limitation
> since I mostly work with linux.
>
> Still, the symptom tha
Duane Hill wrote:
> On Friday, September 8, 2006 at 3:40:06 PM, Bowie confabulated:
>
> > Floyd wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am new to SpamAssassin, I have been testing it for about 3 to 4
> > > weeks now and I have categorized about
> > > 4000 ham and about 1000 spam, and I still get the same
On Friday, September 8, 2006 at 3:40:06 PM, Bowie confabulated:
> Floyd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am new to SpamAssassin, I have been testing it for about 3 to 4
>> weeks now and I have categorized about
>> 4000 ham and about 1000 spam, and I still get the same spam after a
>> few days.
>> What I am
Floyd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to SpamAssassin, I have been testing it for about 3 to 4
> weeks now and I have categorized about
> 4000 ham and about 1000 spam, and I still get the same spam after a
> few days.
> What I am trying to figure out is about sa-learn.
> When I look at the logs and it c
l\bin
The only difference is the logs show c:\perl\bin\spamassassin.bat
and i use c:\perl\bin\spamassassin -t
Is there a difference beteen the twoI don't think so
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spam-on-Exchange-tf2