Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Hepworth
still a little old, 3.3.1 will do alot better job I would suggest -- Martin Hepworth Oxford, UK On 28 April 2011 15:22, Salvatore wrote: > Sorry !! my SA version is: > > spamassassin-3.2.5-2.fc10.i386 > > I am mortified to have given you a wrong information, > Sorry. > > > - > Salvatore. > >

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
Sorry !! my SA version is: spamassassin-3.2.5-2.fc10.i386 I am mortified to have given you a wrong information, Sorry. - Salvatore.

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
"Martin Hepworth" wrote: >Also don't forget the install of SA 3.3 doesn;t include any rules at all and you have to run an sa-update to populate with the latest rules. This version of SA is compatible with amavisd-new 2.2.1 ? I had read that SA 3.3 have problem with amavisd-new 2.2.1, is incorrect

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Hepworth
well it's over 5 years old and even if you're using lots of extra rules I suggest SA will struggle with newer spam around these days. latest SA is quite different so you may want to start from scratch or at least remove any third party rules as alot of these are now included in the normal ruleset

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
"John Hardin" wrote: > You might want to review your bayes training procedures. Do you have > autolearning enabled? That can cause problems under certain > circumstances, > you might want to turn that off. If you are manually training, review > your > corpus for misclassified messages. Misclassifie

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Salvatore wrote: I have posted spam mail: http://pastebin.com/UwBDJcqj The message hit BAYES_20. You might want to review your bayes training procedures. Do you have autolearning enabled? That can cause problems under certain circumstances, you might want to turn that

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread RW
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:59:57 +0200 "Salvatore" wrote: > Yet Another Ninja wrote: > > help us help you and post the sample in http://pastebin.com > > I have posted spam mail: > > http://pastebin.com/UwBDJcqj > Based on the score assigned to RDNS_NONE you're running an older version of SA that

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-28 Thread Salvatore
Yet Another Ninja wrote: > help us help you and post the sample in http://pastebin.com I have posted spam mail: http://pastebin.com/UwBDJcqj Thanks. - Salvatore.

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 2011-04-05 17:44, Salvatore wrote: For to stop this spam I must modify my spamassassin configuration ? What steps I can make for to resolve my problem ? Thanks and sorry for my banal question. Thanks in advance. help us help you and post the sample in http://pastebin.com

RE: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Salvatore
April 05, 2011 5:22 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: mail spam not catched > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:41:54 +0200, "Salvatore" > wrote: > > > Return-Path: > > very well forged > > > X-PHP-Script: multiform.at/sendmail

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:41:54 +0200, "Salvatore" wrote: > Return-Path: very well forged > X-PHP-Script: multiform.at/sendmail.php for 212.231.242.16 php script on public hostname > Return-Path: +all in spf http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=bankofdeerfield.com

Re: mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Salvatore wrote: Hello, from a few days I receive spam and this spam mail have a more low hits, I use spamassassin with postfix/amavisd-new/maia: The spams have ho body? Please post the entire spam(s), body plus _all_ headers, to a website you control or to someplace like

mail spam not catched

2011-04-05 Thread Salvatore
Hello, from a few days I receive spam and this spam mail have a more low hits, I use spamassassin with postfix/amavisd-new/maia: Return-Path: .. Received: from localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) by mail.myserver.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2A12D4001; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:57:41 +0200 (CE

Re: Spam not catched

2009-07-22 Thread Sasa
"Jari Fredriksson" wrote: Was your REAL command "spamassassin --debug --lint" or similar? When run: #spamassassin --debug --lint ... [25557] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.63 [25557] dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.01 linux [25557] dbg: diag: module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.11 [25557]

Re: Spam not catched

2009-07-22 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> Hi, I use SA-3.2.4 (and amavisd-new 2.2.1, Maia and > Postfix) and from a few days I am receiving many spam > mails and I do not understand the reason, the spam mails > that received have always hits more low (for example 0 or > 0.1). When run: #sa-update --debug > ... > [19436] dbg: plugin: load

Spam not catched

2009-07-22 Thread Sasa
Hi, I use SA-3.2.4 (and amavisd-new 2.2.1, Maia and Postfix) and from a few days I am receiving many spam mails and I do not understand the reason, the spam mails that received have always hits more low (for example 0 or 0.1). When run: #sa-update --debug ... [19436] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::S