On 2021-06-17 17:42, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Does anyone have any tips on how to get mail through Gmail's spam
filters?
if 8 millions users say this mail is spam it surrely is spam :)
hint if recipients say its not spam to them, then it could change, it
does not being controlled by se
t to it. The information I've been able to find from Google
is completely unhelpful. I tried signing up for their postmaster
tools, but my volume is too low to show any data.
Does anyone have any tips on how to get mail through Gmail's spam
filters?
Thanks,
Bowie
have sent to it. The information I've been
able to find from Google is completely unhelpful. I tried signing up for their
postmaster tools, but my volume is too low to show any data.
Does anyone have any tips on how to get mail through Gmail's spam filters?
Thanks,
Bowie
OSTKARMA, PSBL,
> SpamCop, SURBL, URIBL, ZEN
>
> They have done the job from getting 300+ Spam in 12 hours to getting 5 I
> have got all of them set to a weight of 30 and enabled for incoming
> blocking.
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/S
On Freitag, 14. April 2006 18:41 Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> it is primarily Yahoo
> and Hotmail clients who identify his messages as Junk/Spam
I think they have in webmail a button "this is spam", which they just
push on his messages. The best is to remove that customers from his
newsletter.
mfg
lves to something then it will quickly be marked as spam. Same
holds true for www.anotherserver.some.
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 9:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Spam filters
Question about spam
gt; From: Curtis Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 9:42 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Spam filters
>
> Question about spam tags, but not specific to spamassassin.
>
> I have a client who has a problem that his email are ofte
t will time out. That is
there is no record for him for smtp.mailserver.com. But maybe some
spam filters somehow check for that as well? I don't know.
Thanks for any input.
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
> So now we know (as if we didn't before) why these show up in 90% of the spam.
Well I put your post through SA here, and this is the result:
Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---
===
A study conducted by Yale University researchers found that of all the words in
the dictionary, there are 12 with the power to positively impact people’s
actions. These aren’t simply words; they are highly-persuasive tools that can
be used to achieve beneficial results:
new
10 matches
Mail list logo
