Jim Maul a écrit :
>
> Exactly. Since spam is not very black and white (like viruses) it is
> very difficult to detect. Especially since one persons ham is anothers
> spam. Deleting these messages entirely could be dangerous. Now if you
> tag at a certain score, and delete at a much higher sco
mouss wrote:
Jim Maul a écrit :
Well for one, it eliminates the possibility of false negatives being
deleted.
you mean False Positives.
Yes of course, my mistake.
The OP probably doesn't know that no filter can detect all spam, and
just spam. Any filter will have some amount of:
- F
Jim Maul a écrit :
>
> Well for one, it eliminates the possibility of false negatives being
> deleted.
you mean False Positives.
The OP probably doesn't know that no filter can detect all spam, and
just spam. Any filter will have some amount of:
- False positives: ham classified as spam
- F
From: "Michael Di Martino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:51:32PM -0500, Michael Di Martino wrote:
I am using the latest stable ver of spamassassin along w/ Simscan on
an SMTP (qmail) stor-&-forward server. No local Mailboxes. [...]
My question is why is a
Eliminating spam is not really an option unless you are willing to toss out
anything valuable that SA might catch by accident. The plan is to *manage* spam.
We pipe spam to a separate mailbox just for that purpose, and then check that
mailbox every so often to (a) loosen rules that are catching
Michael Di Martino wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:51:32PM -0500, Michael Di Martino wrote:
I am using the latest stable ver of spamassassin along w/ Simscan on
an SMTP (qmail) stor-&-forward server. No local Mailboxes. [...]
My question is why is an email with an conte
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:51:32PM -0500, Michael Di Martino wrote:
>> I am using the latest stable ver of spamassassin along w/ Simscan on
>> an SMTP (qmail) stor-&-forward server. No local Mailboxes. [...]
>> My question is why is an email with an content analysis of 4.3
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:51:32PM -0500, Michael Di Martino wrote:
> I am using the latest stable ver of spamassassin along w/ Simscan on an
> SMTP (qmail) stor-&-forward server. No local Mailboxes.
[...]
> My question is why is an email with an content analysis of 4.3 being
> delivered to me as a
I am using the latest stable ver of spamassassin along w/ Simscan on an
SMTP (qmail) stor-&-forward server. No local Mailboxes.
I have my simscan configured with the following options.
---enable-spam
--enable-spam-hits=4.0
However, SPAM is being sent to me as attactment w/ SpamAssassin letting
m
