From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2008, July 01 01:55
Certainly. Using an older release of SA against recent spam will result
in significantly lower detection rates. The code really does matter
quite a lot to detection rate. Things like tweaks to the HTML parser
that dea
the same for everyone, but I want to get the feel of general
statistics (If you don't mind to share)
1. How many Spam detection rate if I am using default 3.2
configuration you would expect?
> 2. If fine tuned according to the wiki, e.g. running sa-update, more
> rules set, how many % you would
howard chen wrote:
Hello,
I am new to SA, I have read through some of the faq and wiki, so far
can't find the average spam rate % detected by SA. I know it is not
the same for everyone, but I want to get the feel of general
statistics (If you don't mind to share)
1. How many Spam
Hi
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you mean "spam rate"? the amount of spam your mailservers will
> receive is quite independent on version of spamassassin.
>
Yes, I would like to know if somewhere can find
On 01.07.08 12:51, howard chen wrote:
> I am new to SA, I have read through some of the faq and wiki, so far
> can't find the average spam rate % detected by SA. I know it is not
> the same for everyone, but I want to get the feel of general
> statistics (If you don't mind
> 1. How many Spam detection rate if I am using default 3.2
> configuration you would expect?
>
I run the default configuration with language filtering (DE FR GB are
OK_Languages) plus some personally developed rules. Bayes is purely
auto-learn.
%non-spam varies from day to day, within the rang
Hello,
I am new to SA, I have read through some of the faq and wiki, so far
can't find the average spam rate % detected by SA. I know it is not
the same for everyone, but I want to get the feel of general
statistics (If you don't mind to share)
1. How many Spam detection rate if
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 9:54 am, Andrew Hearn (AAISP) wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > Total: 580 reports in 39m 28s. 4.08 seconds per report.
> > Tue Nov 21 22:08:56 CST 2006
>
> Sorry to be OT, but are these spam stats a built in feature of SA, or
> have you got a plugin to get this information
Chris wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 November 2006 6:47 pm, Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Yesterday we had a sudden drop in spam-percentage from >80% to near 60%.
>> Parallel to it I got six copies of an undetectable (by NAI and ClamAV)
>> new trojan 'exe' in the Mail.
>>
>> Do we have to prepare fo
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 19:14, Chris wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 November 2006 6:47 pm, Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Yesterday we had a sudden drop in spam-percentage from >80% to near 60%.
> > Parallel to it I got six copies of an undetectable (by NAI and ClamAV)
> > new trojan 'exe' in
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 6:47 pm, Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yesterday we had a sudden drop in spam-percentage from >80% to near 60%.
> Parallel to it I got six copies of an undetectable (by NAI and ClamAV)
> new trojan 'exe' in the Mail.
>
> Do we have to prepare for a new flood by an up
Hi!
Yesterday we had a sudden drop in spam-percentage from >80% to near 60%.
Parallel to it I got six copies of an undetectable (by NAI and ClamAV)
new trojan 'exe' in the Mail.
Do we have to prepare for a new flood by an updated
(just now reorganizing) botnet?
Stucki
--
Christoph von Stuckrad
12 matches
Mail list logo
