We're also using Linux Virtual Server for this which processed close to a
billion messages for us last year. Also sounds like you need the weighted
round robin feature of lvs to weight different servers accordingly which is
something we do as well.
On Jan 8, 2008 1:58 AM, Paolo Cravero <[EMAIL PRO
Thomas Ledbetter wrote:
First of all: we're running amavisd-new, not plain spamc/spamd anymore.
We used to have N servers each running its own spamd deamons, so with separate
Bayes/AWL DB.
I have not understood how many machines run spamc and how many spamd.
With a rounb robin policy on a ha
Thomas Ledbetter wrote:
> With a rounb robin policy on a hardware load balancer, once the
> connection is routed to a specific 'worker bee', if that machine times
> out, the request will fail, and the mail wont get scanned. However,
> more intelligent hardware load balancing setups can monitor th
I've got a few questions for everyone concerning load balancing Spam
Assassin.
I've currently got a 10 node spam assassin cluster, and have been using
round-robin DNS to load balance across them, but Im wondering what other
people recommend?
The benefit of DNS seems to be that spamc will try
