Re: [sa] RE: Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-03 Thread Charles Gregory
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Jonas wrote: But for us as well as bowie, the sought rules are hitting significantly less mails than they used to. Makes me wonder if the spammers have put some work into identifying the spamtraps used to feed the sought rules generator? Have the sought maintainers noticed

RE: Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-03 Thread Jonas
> I understand the problem with the stats program and FP/FN, but the last > time I looked at the stats for sought (which was admittedly quite a while > ago), a couple of the rules were showing in my top 20 spam rules. > Now I have to go all the way down to 111 to find the first one. I would like t

Re: Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-03 Thread Warren Togami
On 02/03/2010 09:18 AM, Justin Mason wrote: The corpus-quality for that masscheck doesn't look too bad though: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100201-r905213-n/T_JM_SOUGHT_1/detail?s_corpus=1#corpus That day was fine. The weekly masscheck however had only 50k spam. Warren

Re: Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-03 Thread Justin Mason
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 18:21, Warren Togami wrote: > On 02/02/2010 12:07 PM, Adam Katz wrote: >> >> That is quite different from our masscheck stats.  Today's results at >> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100201/%2FJM_SOUGHT look like this: >> >>    SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME >>

Re: Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-02 Thread Warren Togami
On 02/02/2010 12:07 PM, Adam Katz wrote: That is quite different from our masscheck stats. Today's results at http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100201/%2FJM_SOUGHT look like this: SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME 9.8564 0.0042 1.0000.940.01 T_JM_SOUGHT_3 8.1587

Re: Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-02 Thread Bowie Bailey
Adam Katz wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > >> Since the sought rules have been updating for a while now, I took a >> look at my stats to see how they were doing. They used to be one >> of my most useful rules, but recently, they don't seem to be doing >> so good. >> >> Here are the stats for the

Re: Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-02 Thread Adam Katz
Bowie Bailey wrote: > Since the sought rules have been updating for a while now, I took a > look at my stats to see how they were doing. They used to be one > of my most useful rules, but recently, they don't seem to be doing > so good. > > Here are the stats for the last month: That looks like

Sought rules not doing so good

2010-02-02 Thread Bowie Bailey
Since the sought rules have been updating for a while now, I took a look at my stats to see how they were doing. They used to be one of my most useful rules, but recently, they don't seem to be doing so good. Here are the stats for the last month: TOP SPAM RULES FIRED ---